we couldnt even do that with the PL-12AE one i am psure
If that’s what you’re referring to, there’s nothing interesting there
all the specifications simply mirror the specs from the sensor stand
the post was still accepted as a source afaik
and it would literally be just giving it like 400secs of guidance time and some decent loft, but i guess thats too much to ask of gaijin
no it wasnt
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LziXIlDhpUeB
that report was made by the same guy that went on to AI generate the image for his second ever report
not what i was referencing, but i double checked and most reports were made with the placards so i was wrong
No one used the AVIC post to report the PL-12A
@genises1o LD8 and LD8A are anti-radiation missiles modified based on the PL10 and PL15 airframes, respectively.
1 Like
The LD-8—yes, it is based on the PL-10.
However, the LD-8A differs from the PL-15: it has its own housing and is smaller in diameter and shorter
3 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DFZFRE61YU7P
Looks like the J-15T takeoff bug got fixed on the Su-33 instead. What the hell, lol…
3 Likes
can the ld10 be carried on dual racks
yes, only in-game though since gaijin made them compatible wherever PL-12 can be mounted, irl they use different rails
1 Like
When is Gaijin going to fix the triangular MFD screen on the right side of the J-16?
7 Likes
Probably never
2 Likes
ld10 uses PF-12 and PFT-12,as the vehicle can carry them is’s fine
1 Like
both ld10 and sd10a use the sdf10a transmitter, and the sdf10a is the pf12。
J-16‘s trip to Egypt expose more cockpit detail, so I conclude all sources available online to recreate J-16 cockpit.
Up till now, most part of the simulated cockpit can be demonstrated.
Posted an issue for adding materals to already accepted one, but I don’t know whether it disobey the rules.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/t79nR1XTKhKd
13 Likes
That’s how almost all HAVE GLASS vipers look IRL lol
Are there any updates on the J16 getting the underbelly double pylon? I know this comment was made back in 2024 but I assume this still applies?
1 Like
In what way is it applies? That guy is just a moderator, and the issue of twin pylons is just his opinion
nope
4 Likes
Imo It shouldn’t get an underbelly double pylon like the si-35, it should get a wing mounted double pylon like the j-15t
1 Like