But the current Catcher M is even weaker than the APG65, and the Catcher M is considered one of the most powerful PD radars
What do you mean less powerful? The range is fine but scan rate needs a buff
Pretty sure captor m isn’t the only one with big issues though, a lot if not all radars in game have similar issues with range and scan rate
Beyond the scan rate issue, which is going to be really difficult to fix unless the Devs are willing to take a bit of a leap of faith.
There are a vast number of bugs and issues plaguing CAPTOR-M at the moment that is rendering it nearly unusable. If it was a straight C&P of the FA2s radar, it would still be underperforming but certainly usable, this really isnt. I’ve given up for now and focusing on the Rodney grind.
Bugs include everything from ghosts targets to targets just not appearing on radar.
I expect to see a LOT of changes incoming days/weeks. Its probably the weakest radar above 13.0 at the moment and probably a fair few lower than that which are better
1 Like
yeah those are pretty bad, theyll be ironed out over a week or 2 hopefully
hopefully is the right word. i fear it not being fixed before the devs go on holiday
I mean the real-life Catcher M is considered one of the best performing mechanical scanning radars, but it performs so badly in the game
I like and hate how accurate this is.
I have ~200 reports, some accepted, some fixed, but MANY still to go.
WHEN are you going to change the Mk 103/101s Pzbrsprgr. From I-T to ApI-T as it should be?! GAIJIN PLEASE, im waiting for like 2-3 years now, why is it so hard?!
Overall:
I-T → ApI-T with 58mm Pen (Abcbc round)
Fuze sensitivity: non → 5mm
Fuze delay: non → 0,75m (+/- 0,25m)
It would help the Air targets belt and the Horton 229s HVAP belt so much. Yes it has 1 of it in them.
From new to old:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7PtepDs2KAIY
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/rv6fXQFaVS17
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0QGPhUERPKiP
1 Like