What about the gripen e and all his problems ? :^)
Edit : i understand that copy paste is a thing to gain time when adding new jets/tanks, however its been a month (i think) since the update is here and still nothing is fixed
1 Like
11.3 is something I predicted based on heavy tanks vs lighter armored tanks of equal lethality.
I’d be patient and keep an open mind about the BR change.
11.3 for 800mm penning missiles and 30mm APDS… just heavily, heavily armored.
Especially since there’s now hard evidence the ammo storage is incorrect.
Any 2A72 is capable of 3UBR11
2 Likes
Now we just need to see the Namer buffed to be on the level of it’s russian counterpart, now that they share a BR we should see it’s armour fixes, weight fix and if we’re lucky, some additional missiles/ammo in the hull
1 Like
Not according to the documents, which all state that it has pressure issues when firing an APFSDS shell
1 Like
I’m sorry, “The documents”? Are you talking about the sekrit ones, or some other random shit?
You can find them fairly easily in any thread discussing the BTR/BMP3/BMD.
2A72 isn’t compatible with darts
I am unable to give you an answer without you mentioning a specific “fix”. If there is a bug report in place, you can ask any tech mod about it’s status or even link one in your post.
1 Like
BMPT just gets new friends to play with. Still going to kick butt.
I’m actually glad it is out of the 10.7 lineup, because vehicles like the Object292 deserve to shine on their own.
1 Like
Well the rwr is not 360°, maw doesnt work or launch flares only, mfd are bugged and hmd is the same as the gripen c while it should not be.
Speaking of bug report, there is like 20 of them made by a lot of people, all marked as “accepted” but, nothing new
1 Like
Eh, it’s now facing tanks with 3BM60 equivalent rounds which punch through the weakspots a lot easier than others.
Of course there are still some tanks [MSC and Type 90/10P] that are still rocking DM23-equivalent and DM33 respectively, but ideally they’re with literally any other tech tree at the same time.
I guess that’s an issue if you run around the battlefield playing like nothing can hurt you. I prefer using it in cities and other close quarters where I de-track, de-gun, and then go to work on them (the enemy).
I would love to see the BTR-80A get APFSDS in game
1 Like
It depends on who is saying it bro, always go for quality over quantity, if they all have lousy stats with negative kd/low winning rate, chances are they are all dogwater so their opinions hold little to no value bro its like listening to poor people on how to become rich
1 Like
Nice, I hope it will include RoF and accuracy adjustments for vessels.
*cough Littorio *cough
2 Likes
very cringe
1 Like
Yeah, except I haven’t.
Wanna go ahead and substantiate with The Document?
From everything I see 3UBR11 conforms to the same 410MPa maximum that the 3UBR8 was mandated to follow.
1 Like
23 Likes
Mig-25 still missing its RWR in the cockpit
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zJOKympFoxza
and sea eagle still missing from both the harrier FRS1 and FA2
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/OxbA4eVMhOL1
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2IXvDNZc4gs3
3 Likes
Finally. Just needs a little.more though
Thank god, knew it wasn’t right
And still nothing for GBUs
4 Likes