Again it doesn’t matter. It wont come and it shouldn’t imo. The JA37 chassis is not good. The only good thing on sweden is the JAS39 and the A21RB. Guess you’ll be upset about the F18/A-C/D MLU 2.
Lol u trying to get the report understated won t work
Thats if the devs decide that which so far Smin has given good enough reasons why they decided against AIM 120. When they fix the lofting they will be better. Besides britain doesnt need a gripen as their main fighter when they have EFT in December as a likely new fighter. You should keep asking Smin maybe he’ll change his mind 👍
Sorry Smin lol
I honestly don’t see how you are this upset about this and then also link to a source that proves you wrong immediately.
1 Like
He doesnt want to grind any other TT, he only has access to top tier through premiums so that would be another 75 USD iirc so he doesnt want that. Hate to tell him but not all nations get the exact same vehicle. Especially since it makes no sense to add AIM 120’s when they already have 3 ARH planes. 2 with AIM 120
Guess he should’ve bothered actually reading
Ahahah , Nice try , Nice Photoshop , the work u put into this , u know when u Open the actual site your photoshop won t BE there. It Will apear the gbu 50 , but Nice try
Foldout and Iron are two different brochures
Lame atempt , when u Open site and then check PDF from there u see reality
Its called gripen C foldout by SAAB go ahead and keep being ignorant, you clearly aren’t actually trying to find real evidence against it.
Cry all you want but there it is, R-Darter
So wanna go ahead and delete your posts claiming it was photoshopped so you can stop looking like a clown or do you want to continue and look like the entire circus?
Oh god hes building the whole circus right now.
1 Like
No it proves you’re wrong lmao, that is an official brochure, you couldnt be bothered to spend 5 min to actually find evidence.
Foldout is the older product brochure iirc which shows what was in use. You can try to deny it but as long as the brochure exists it proves that R-Darters are compatible with the Gripen C.
Kinda hilarious that bro is vehemently denying that the pdf is real when you can find it fairly easily on the saab website under the Gripen C series page, and lo and behold, there is the pdf’s for the quick facts on the C-series, the aggressor, and the packing iron for the C-series at the bottom. Which has R-Darder on there.
1 Like
Here’s more BTW
2 Likes
dude… Go to SAAB website, search “Darter”, click “documents”, 3 results, look at “foldout” version and “brochure” version of the pdf.
It’s actually there.
i even linked to it. you can click the link and see that it is the saab website…
1 Like
Yeah, the purely Swedish platforms early on are decent but nothing crazy. My biggest gripe with most of them, is the subpar mobility. Like even the upper tier Ikv light tanks and various 9.3 to 10.0 CV platforms (Strf/Lvkv) are held back by how sluggish they are. Guns are excellent though.
They begin to shine bright at 10.3 with the 2A4/Strv 121 and only get better from there. The 10.3 line-up is very comfy.
I’m not super familiar with IRL Swedish/Scand tech but if what @Pheonix_RX01 says is true, it’s really a missed opportunity to have more OG Scandinavian vehicles.
Edit : as far as why I enjoy the T-34/Pz/Pbv/Charioteer platforms compared to SPGs comes down to my playstyle. I don’t enjoy casemate SPGs, slow tanks, gimmick “support” vehicles. I’m very steak and potatoes when it comes to tanks : good versatile “medium” tanks… Glass canons I can manage great if mobility follows suit.
Whats up?
Also the finnish placed a bigger gun on their Charioteer and tried to sell it, would’ve been more unique than the current Charioteer we have since it has a bigger cannon.
1 Like