true, think that would still make me prefer SEP over SEPv2 though
1 Like
If they make both TUSK and Trophy optional, with TUSK being scaled down with Trophy installed, that would be a great bit of middle ground. You can do away with the ERA, but keep the APS
They added Trophy to the M1s of 4 armored brigades, or is what at least is planned. I doubt all the SEPv2s they are using are the newer models. So there also shouldn’t be an excuse where the older ones don’t have it.
they still havent fixed m735 on the 105 m1 after what 2 updates since they said they made a mistake from the bug report on it or that it was a false report and said they were going to fix it
1 Like
Gaijin: if it is not Russia we are not fixing it. Tough. Igor has a napkin with a modification for the Su-34 that says its great though. He is totally reliable you know?
Exactly. They could have used M829A3, its historical munition choice which even according to Gaijin “wouldn’t change much ingame anyway”…
What about the breech?
Honestly I would exchange the reload rate on the m1 for this round and any of the fixes. Still can’t believe they thought that would appease the player base for the abrams and mutiple vehicles.
Been my feeling since they made that change.
None of the actual issues present with the M1s got fixed, all the change did was make people who hate the M1s mald, while not really changing the actual gameplay of the M1s at all.
I would gladly trade the reload buff for a fixed turret ring, or similar.
That was my thought as soon as they changed the reload, and it showed to be true. I’ve heard non stop griping about the reload rate now, and “I don’t know why US player complain the Abrams is fine” etc. that Abrams blog that was posted did nothing to help the situation and the monitoring to find better solutions so far has yielded no results, instead they nerfed the turret ring armor in the last patch.
3 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT are there any plans this update or soon in the future to do the same change that was done in modeling that was done with the slat armor to the Sepv2?
3 Likes
Afraid? To see Abram or another tanks got improve? How much Gaijin pay you?
1 round every 5 seconds
I’d give it back for changes. The reload rate did nothing for people that actually wanted tangible change.
Everone makes a big deal about it having a 5 second reload. It’s not the only top tier MBT with it. Hell the TKX and type10 has an 4 second reload.
This is about fixing errors in the game not some BS about gaijins reload balance choice.
3 Likes
I just remembered, don’t forget how the M1A2 SEPs both have turret composite armor less effective than RHA against chemical threats.
I say for the M1A2’s armor penetration, it should be 600mm instead of 480mm tbh. And for the front composite’s pen should be 675mm as well.
Yes they changed that last update on the upper front plate of the SEP last update. Never really got an answer then either as to why.
1 Like
Since that change, the only thing has been done is a change from RHA to CHA in the front upper plate. No suggestions that were accepted have been implemented. We need full measures, not tweaks
3 Likes