ATGM vehicles are as good as the Map they get. If you get somethings like Advance to the Rhine. It gonna suck. But if you get somethings like volokolamsk , Fulda gap then you’re gold.
I agree about ammo box placement.
Abrams is great M1A1 is my favorite but i have a soft spot for the IPM1 mainly because its a bit faster
Merk 1A is 9.0 the 2B is 9.3 (i don’t have any 9.3 aside from the other XM tonk with the 20mm)
Also i dont like helicopters.
So? Ones 9.0 and worse than the XM803 imo since its slower speed than a centurion. Both the XM’s have great mobility and silly suspension for shooting from weird angles. The amount of people that aren’t using the suspension for sitting in areas you normally couldn’t shoot actually suprises me
I take speed as one of the most important features of a tank. Its why i like the abrams. If i can’t get to spots to counter flanks or move after being shot than im as good as dead.
Again, the A-4E has no lineup There’s literally one 9.3 tank for it, and it’s not even a particularly good one.
Technically a lineup and as i stated its not great but i always get around 2-4 kills in a bad match in the A4E i think any match where i can rearm and get even more kills is a pretty decent match.
Bro it’s 8.3. At the same BR most nations have TOW carriers with only a single tow RTF and a completely exposed gunner. TOW-2B is a BR 9.7 minimum. The 901 is probably the best ATGM vehicle at the rank.
LMFAO u cant be serious?
Name a better atgm carrier then.
You have completely missed the point!
You say the TOW-2B is a 9.7 minimum but there is the Pbv 302 with the RB 56 BILL at 8.7 which is much better than TOW-2B’s, 500mm of top attack pen vs 100mm.
TOW-2B was nerf. It should have 2 EFP in 1 warhead. (2 penetrator)
And ERA should have less effect against EFP due to it being kinetic energy penetrator.
What did you expect tbh?
It`s a TD for a extremly niche kinda use
TBF the PBV is one of the most worthless vehicles lol
TOW-2B is at 8.7 on the CM25
ok, you’re right. I guess the Wiesel is just overtiered.
But because the massive survivability advantage of the M901 and also having 2rtf missiles instead of 1, and also thermals which the CM-25 lacks, the 901 would be at least 9.0, likely 9.3. Thinking the 901 is “sad” at 8.3 when it’s the single strongest ATGM carrier at the BR is silly frankly.
M3 Bradley
Better mobility but way less survivable
Better mobility, survivability, and has an autocannon.
Eh, i can stick my gun up while hiding behind cover and on some maps people just aren’t looking at those spots where as the Bradley uses spots that most other vehicles use where players can see and expect me