Found 39E air frame with KEPD 350 and Spice 1000(?) mockup
The external fuel tank carries 1000L and jet fuel is proximately 800kg per 1000L
( https://www.fmv.se/projekt/jas-39-gripen/mer-fakta-om-jas-39-gripen/ )
So at minimum that plus the fuel canisters weight.
And the NG has been seen with some large bombs on the belly pylons:
so likely able to stem the weight of most heavy ordinances
Yeah, it should be able to carry 4 of the RB15 at the same time:
( Saab Receives Order for Next Generation Anti-Ship Missile )
1 Like
yeah I know, but I don’t know if I’ve seen anything heavier on the outmost under wing pylon on the 39E. 39C is limited there as it can only carry maybe 500kg or somehing because a RBS15 on that pylon does not work on that plane.
I very much doubt that it would be able to carry 4 KEPD 350 though both due to size and weight limitations
2 Likes
Anyone know if the mfds are accurate for the e? Low k surprised the mfds don’t have nctr, pretty annoying. It’s the same issue that the gripen a/c has.
gripen a being even more annoying as it’s copy paste f-16 mfds.
I don’t believe so, some things are still sorta classified iirc but given the Gripens are a mess in general and the 6002 was clearly rushed and lacks its own HMD it’s very likely they used the Gripen C MFD as a base and called it a day.
2 Likes
Might be close enough, though it’s also hard to find actual images of the WADS with other configurations.
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-4i9pC4VWc (Also damn lots of info on that screen 👀)
WT: Obviously not truly accurate, but also it’s probably difficult to properly model a WADS within WT’s engine
1 Like
There is some good fotage of the WAD in this video of the JAS39E simulator that is at a museum:
Here is the closest version to what we have in game:
1 Like
I just took a screenshot from this video which is in Swedish at Flygvapenmuséet in Linköping.
1 Like
@Michael-IR (@ostgh and @Pheonix_RX01 as well)
HUD color will be fixed with next major: ( Community Bug Reporting System )
4 Likes
other issues will be fixed too right ?
No idea. I don’t know anything more than you guys :)
I just got a notification that the bug report had been answered since i had commented in it.
2 Likes
Has anyone made bug report about RWR coverage?
Iırc someone made for JAS39C but haven’t seen anything for E model.
I was referring to missing K Band coverage.
I don’t think i’ve seen a report for band coverage. All the reports that are discussed in this thread are compiled at the top:
Edit, the RWR spherical report also mention the K/L-bands, not sure if that will be included in any possible fix though.
1 Like
the fact that the new f16 got a 360° rwr from what i saw is a joke
I don’t think it did, i’m not at all certain though but i think i’ve seen complaints here on the forum about that it didn’t get the 360° RWR.
Edit:
They have reported it and the report forwarded/linked to internal reports but it’s not marked as “fixed”.
( Community Bug Reporting System )