michæl is doing the heavy lifting here, i just lurk wayyy too much on this thread.
4 Likes
Wait, that’s exactly what we needed for the RR missiles on twin pylons.
Is your source verified ?
Added. Had it happen to me too
1 Like
The website gives kinda impression that it’s a hobbyist’s online repository of gripen ng marketing brochures they found somewhere
1 Like
shouldn’t the 120C be called RB99 too on Gripen E?
In this case no as Sweden never used AIM-120C5. Only AIM-120B and AIM-120C8 which are both called Rb99 in service.
3 Likes
they should add C-8 since it’s the same C-7 which is also the same as C-5
2 Likes
right now by ingame naming conventions, sweden’s aim120c-5 should be renamed to RB-99C(-5) or something of the sorts
1 Like
Personally I’m using a lang mod so dont really care about Gaijin’s naming
Huge W if this gets implemented. Might see a BR raise if it does though it’ll do fine if bumped to 14.3
1 Like
A 2025 plane sitting at 14.3 and even higher would not raise any eyebrows. Tho, there’s a lot more missing at the moment and hopefully devs are on it. Hopefully!
1 Like
Btw, does accepted mean they passed to the devs? At least i cannot find these in the suggestion forums.
yes it should mean it got passed
2 Likes
3 outstanding camos for Gripen E:
@Michael-IR Any findings for the 39E’s IRST? Mainly with the ranging, like how the Flankers and Eurofighters IRST’s are?
I only have IR-OTIS info so not really
Wdym?
Ir Otis is the irst that was tested on the gripen a in the 90s
But does Gripene use skyward?