Could be this? Brochure that mentions the Gripen inside.
There’s another website that lists multiple other APU models used but not sure if its accurate.
Any chance the K-band RWR warning gets fixed along with this too？
Sure, there’s a chance. I couldn’t tell you what it is, though. What threats does it face that are even K-band anyway? Not too well versed on radar bands.
The Pantsir s1 and SM SV’s tracking radar, although they do have a separate, I want to say I-band, search radar.
Gripen E should be able to see all of these spectrums, gaijin should hurry up and correct it if not
Upon some digging, both manufacturers of either APU (T-62T-46LC1 from Solar, and Hamilton Sundstrand (P&W); TGA-15 from Microturbo) seem to be confirming it [not even mentioning the APS 1000.pdf (which is also partially made by HS) you’ve attached]. I’m not really willing to spend my little saved up money on looking through that blog–site’s sources, so, nothing conclusive sadly…
i’ve found some low–res images of TGA-15 on this website: Aerospace Engines A to Z
T-62T-46LC1
APS-1000 (note that the website itself noted that that is a specific version of the APS-1000)
edit: created a baseline report for the missing apu: [DEV] JAS 39 (all variants) missing APU in damage model
aand it got closed as “not a bug.” Well, there’s no marker, just closed rn…
Tail as old time…
What’s the possibility of a wing-span report being accepted, as there’s been some for J-10 and Rafale that were accepted
Unsure. Would probably be without the wingtip pylon/ecm pod included for the wingspan. There were some talks about that a while back in the thread about it.