I wonder, if it would be possible to fit the BOL pylons on the centerline rails. Just a thought crossing my mind
the issue is that there shouldnt be launch rails on the centerline
the AMRAAMs interface directly with the part that comes down from the fulesalage IRL
so you wouldnt be able to fit BOL rails there since those are ejector pylons IRL
2 Likes
Can you open the protection analysis on a tank and select the PELE-T as ammo to test to see it’s stats?
2 Likes
Here is the change log for it:
and here is the current statcard:
Edit:
seems like the change is correct, they had probably accidentally combined the HE and AP into one shell when making the PELE-T instead of taking the data from the actual PELE-T.
Will be interesting to see hoe it performs in-game after the change though. looks just worse in general now.
I tested it a bit and its definitely a lot worse, Penetration feels terrible
@Gunjob Also sorry to poke you but do you think you’d be able to bump up this bug report, regarding a “landing flap” option.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nNnnun3TEqqZ
Do you have an estimate for how far it takes for the in-game Gripen to land?
I haven’t taken the chance to record that yet. I’m moreso focused on the landing approach of the Gripen currently.
There are still afew things missing when it lands though such as the elevons also lift dumping on landing.
That can be done by pitching down manually, right? Or is it smth else?
The canards move. The elevons don’t stay up as they should.
they nerfed it?
Different belt composition so unsure. I always found the BK-27 bi-polar to use IMO. It works and slaps people, or it just sparks often.
I just saw the ratio of golden(explosive) shells to red(AP shells) go down so I assumed it’s a nerf lol
At least something is being done for it.
Tragic the iteration it looks like though. No stand off shenanigans against land targets.
What do you mean?
Designation of the first iteration, so we aren’t getting the latest with land attack capacity, so we can’t conduct shenanigans. It’s neither here nor there in the grand scheme, and the 4 was unlikely, but would have been silly. At least Viggen will have something resembling a use now.
Oh, yeah. Looks like it, sort of understandable though. Mk.4 might be gray area on the edge of to OP. It might not be to OP to add depending on what functions and mechanics they have planned for anti ship missiles in general.