the aim54 dosent even use a proper PD seeker
1 Like
R-37M isn’t coming to War Thunder for years.
Does it matter?
you dont even need chaff to defeat a aim54 regardless of if it is in look down or look up mode
1 Like
I said nothing about the AIM-54A, and since you mentioned it… u basically shows that there are ARH lower then 13.0…
it will still suck even at 12.7
that thing will suck unless it is at 11.0
it will be completly pointless for WT
yes actually i agree we need a F2P 11.0 R-73 carrier at 11.0 since su25bm is marketplace (but i still want R-77(-1) at 13.0 so R-77 can finally join the 13.0 ARH gang but eh what a shame)
it would be just like the L-39
either you give it missiles and will suck because of the BR those missiles will put it at or you dont give it missiles and it will still suck because of its bad flightperformance as a trainer
Dosen’t matter. if a Su-25 can do a good job with the R-73, then I assume the Yak-130M can be better
it wont becasue the Su-25 isnt a trainer
it dosent have anemic engiens
the yak130 is just a worst su25, only tv500 and unguided bomb/rocket, no a single f&f missile or vikhr (correct me if i am wrong)
Alr since you have proven how bad the aircraft is then we can put it down to 9.3 with R-73 and R-77… if both are still useless then we can move lower… I would really want to see how are you gonna hit my plane 20km away using a Su-25…
rear aspect R-60 max at 9.3
It the M version not the earliest. So it can able to carry more modern equipment.
why do you use su25 as a fighter, do your job at ground and fight only when you get attack
no… because if it suck with R-73 and R-77 then I assume with R-60 it can go fight propellers…
like what, send some proof
Fighter took away the job.
refer to this:
it isnt too hard to understand that