Its not, its an issue of business design. Gaijin needs these little nuggets of unrealism to keep the russian tree competetive and therefore the biggest and most profitable russian playerbase happy
He’s leaving out everything NATO that disproves his point. Rafale 1+ year dominance, 64E, Hammer is borderline fake with its 1.5km ir seeker irl (if you use the 38MT fake logic ofc)
1 Like
fake kd?
1 Like
whats that
1 Like
Youre missing Morvrans point. Hes complaining that all these russian vehicles are strong due to selective realism going on, not necessarily that they are strong in general
I’m going to bed soon so just this quick answer:
Realism and it’s creative use has always been a part of WT, whether it is to make certain tanks artificially worse or better. I don’t care since I don’t play this game for realism. I can go play GHPC or suffer in ArmA for that. Or I can have fun replaying Operation Flashpoint (again).
2 Likes
why cant you say that instead of insulting me? See how easy that was?
Bro, I seriously advise you, and anyone else on that mater, to stop arguing with those people.
They just want to say there is no russian bias just to say there is no russian bias, whatever arguments you will state to them they’ll still do it.
Reasonable people know there is favoritism implemented ingame, and that’s all that maters.
I only debate with serious people trying to understand why I’m saying the bias exists, from now on.
1 Like
you’re the one here that started this no? and also keep going on for reasons that anyone with a brain or not can also understand
1 Like
Not really, since their change of minds regarding blueprint vehicles the main factors that could be considered selectively realistic were loadout restrictions and just not knowing things. The selective realism were seeing now is not that, its deliberate against better knowledge.
Realism being bent is not the problem, it’s if it’s too strong, of which other nations has an equal amount of vs Russia.
1 Like
- Because Hangman is at least respectful, you’re not.
- We’ve never talked about this topic
3 Likes
and who’s the 78% of people that agrees with you? cause so far I been seeing 10 peoples explaining to you its just the bad quality made models and majority of them doesn’t even have a leopard nor russians vehicles as their most used but the dude with a bmpt which he does play russia a lot and still tell you that bias isn’t real and calling someone dishonest while you never know them is kinda ironic
1 Like
How am i not respectful? You have no proof.
Easy to say when you dont care about it and are not on the negative end of recieving it
1 Like
I main all nations. Russia is my least played in the past 6 months.
1 Like
and its not a strange thing gaijin gives us papers/wooden mockups vehicles and weapons for “diversity” in the game and yes theyre somewhat questionable but russia ain’t the only thing that the world resolve around them
3 Likes
I’m the one writing literally very long lists of the bias point by point because they’re objectively true and cannot be denied lol
The answers to that : “keep coping” “look at ur kd bad lmao xd” “I refer to shark stats” “abrams armor isn’t green in this specific area, you see ?”
How can you reasonate with those people.
1 Like
that’s the most normal day for war thunder players ever, still have a bad armor but does it stop people from actually being good to use them? if so then everyone in their family would be playing russia only and mixed battles 24/7
3 Likes