No wonder no one is crying about the punisher of 8.3.
BRs are changed because they’re OP in the hands of everyone.
Thanks for admitting EBR was OP in the hands of everyone.
It was quite literally a faster AMX-13 2 BRs lower [now 2.3].
So everyone can play the EBR 54 can they?
Initially it was locked behind an event, and now it’s locked behind the market.
It’s not readily accessible if I open a new account and don’t want to spend over 150€ on gjn
The event didn’t recieve much reception at all for the EBR since the ground branch was fairly unpopular, i remember more people going for the PFM than class 3p
2 Likes
BRs aren’t changed just because one player does well in them.
Case-in-point: Jagdpanzer IV and F-18A.
Just because I know they’re OP, and I perform as they’re OP doesn’t mean everyone else does.
So those OP vehicles don’t change BRs.
So the Object 279 went up for no reason then I assume, your logic is flawed if it states that a small chunk of the playerbase abhsing a vehicle won’t cause it to go up in BR.
The EBR 54 (and for another example, CL13B in italy) never dominated or oppressed the entire BR range like the BMPT, and that’s just blatantly obvious given the difference in size of the player pools of these vehicles.
An OP vehicles in the hands of tech tree and premium players (in the 2nd most popular tree in game too) has far more match presence than an equally powerful vehicle in a minor nation, let alone a minor nation event vehicle.
1 Like
@I_MiikaL_I
So the Object 279 and BMPT went up for “no reason” according to your “logic” [it’s actually called rationale, not logic].
The EBR 54 dominated 4.3 without equal, far worse than BMPT.
Your post implies you weren’t in those matches nor watched videos.
👍yes 👍
Well ive played russia and i can confirm it exists
on 1st hit
- Black Engines + Black Transmission + Black Rotor Hub
- On fire
- Dropping like a stone
…
huh?
6 Likes
You mg the ebr though? like it was fast and annoying but it wasn’t going to end an entire game by itself, much less could it hold w. The trade off was much like the m18 it was horrible armored and had even worse survivability, if somebody remotely looked in its direction it was over for the tank.
I don’t think all that bias allowed you to perform any better though.
4 Likes
Zero Russian Rank VIII vehicles played? ✔
Using typical premium lineup at Rank VII with a 0.8 K/D in the TURMS, 0.9 K/D in the 2S38 and 1.3 K/D in T-80UD? ✔
Barely over 50 battles played across all three vehicles? ✔
Most played tank being the T-34/85, and has a 44% winrate and 0.8 K/D? ✔
Very few total number of games played across the entire tech tree? ✔
If there’s Russian Bias, why does it not seem to be helping you?
9 Likes
It’s also funny that he has ~1.45 K/D in XM246 and ~1.93 K/D in T58 which are clear outliers when compared to his average. What’s even funnier is the fact he’s defending T58 at 8.3. Isn’t it crazy how bias opinions turn on a dime when we aren’t discussing a certain nation ?
US bias is surely helping him in his 8.3 punisher lineup.
7 Likes
Because its not just gamplay, its the constant additions of Russian spaa’s and other vehicles.
Do you know whats also funny? Making the t58 face tanks with ERA and darts.
It already faces them.
Global stats show it, your own stats show it, T58 is overperforming at 8.3, simple as.
1 Like
Personal opinion: Russian bias doesn’t exist for making certain vehicles good, it exists when making them historically accurate.
4 Likes
Because i dont have a skill issue.
You’re controlling your other vehicles as well, but they for some reason perform much worse in your own hands. Guess why.
2 Likes