Auto reload machine also have speed restrict in reality . Usually < 25km
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Game is perfectly coded, that is on you bro - git gud
Joke aside, DM53 still isn’t better than L27 when facing with T-90 side angle. So I’m not delusional after all
@小小格温大受影响
1.7 - 2:1 KDR is not terrible in the slightest.
1.5 KDR in an 11.7 tank playing at 12.7 is hilariously good as well.
& no, I don’t want to destroy Russian players’ experience when playing my NATO tanks.
What weird false accusations Russia’s equipment defenders make…
1 Like
IS, KV and ISU chasis CONSISTENTLY survive sturmtiger direct hits, i hate them. Though many other heavies can survive, i found russian ones the most obnoxious to deal with.
1 Like
So this is the reason why you support the CAS buff
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
@小小格温大受影响
You supporting CAS being buffed =/= others doing so.
CAS hasn’t even been buffed.
Since SPAA was buffed in 2025, I’ve been happy; I stopped maining CAS in late 2024 as is. Haven’t touched an aircraft in ground battles above 9.0 this year to my knowledge. The highest one was a B-52.
The fact you CAS mains call the capture points & the enemy spawns “the rear” is hilarious.
Really, how about you mention US 8.7 br and T-58, France 7.7, US 6.7 and now Japan 6.3 to 7.3. What about the famous Panther 2 and Tiger 105mm at 6.7 br? What about Strv dominance at top tier? Not saying that USSR does not have powerful stuff such as IS-7 and 279 but their cost and perfromance to 8.7 is nowhere near the same price range. (equal cost should= oportunity) not as it is today 30 bucks tank being able to easily defeat a 2000 dollar tank. Ohh did I forget E-100. This game has always had some form of update swing but it is never toward one nation.
You not happy . So you think KH38 jet should reduce BR
If an SU 35 can carry KH-38 ME/MT, there is no reason why the SM2 can’t carry it. SM2 is the closest plane to Su-35.
@小小格温大受影响
Me, many years ago to this date: “Kh-38MT carriers should be X.”
Today, X is 13.0, and 12.x for the Su-25SM3 cause it’s a Harrier equivalent jet.
That’s not reducing BR.
Granted, I’m pretty sure I’ve argued for 13.7 existing for top CAS platforms since 12.7 exists in ground now.
What does any of that stuff have to do with russian stuff getting artificial capability buffs in top tier?
1 Like
It shouldnt, and it doesnt as in game marketplace vehicle’s prices is just from supply and demand
That screenshot is irrelevant to their post.
Smin is talking about F-15B material used for F-15A, a newer aircraft to an older aircraft.
The comparison would be Su-30SM armament being used as proof for Su-35’s armament, or SM2’s used for SM’s.
Otherwise it’s a false equivalence fallacy.
Smin would have to say “F-15A’s documentation can’t be used for F-15B’s armament” for it to be an equivalent comparison, but Smin didn’t say that, cause no one even made a historical report for F-15B as it’s not in-game.
The SM2 is the closest to SU35 in terms of avionics and compatability therefore I dont see a reason why it can not carry the KH-38 missile, SM2 is also developed in conjunction with SU-35 and at times delivered during the same time period and batch production.
Well it is far feched idea to say that supply and demand equal price here on the market. It should be equal cost and equal oportunity imagine if you are racing and buy a Ferrari only for some one else to buy a stock Toyota Corrola and outperform you on the strait away, there is no logic in that.
I think we should also push for tank br increase to 13.0 or 13.3.
Its not irrelevant. It means exactly what it says. You need to proof that a weapon is relevant for a certain aircraft. Relation to other aircraft does not matter and is not an argument. Everything you guys are yapping is pure speculation on your part.