So yeah, several nations are receiving things they shouldn’t just to keep them competitive.
Great job at ignoring the entire rest of the comment.
Nothing to be ignored.
I knew M829A3 damage felt off. Still wild that I have had so much fun with the SEPv3 even with scuffed M829A3.
2 Likes
Yes there is but of course you’re not gonna say anything about the rest because that would mean that you’d need an actual argument and couldn’t just yap like usual.
The company that makes Tiger helicopters doesn’t treat the Tiger like Boeing treats AH-64s.
Boeing will send out an update that makes even AH-64As compatible with JAGMs, but we know it’s a software limitation of older systems and not a wiring one.
Boeing will integrate for the entire software suite, but I have only found evidence that Tiger helicopters aren’t treated equally.
That is what it means for restrictions of that nature, and why it’s a false equivalence to compare AH-64s & Tigers to a singular helicopter with no other examples in-game.
The same situation of Mi-28NM having 4 store positions of AGMs is Mirage 2000 5F getting access to 4x Magic 2s, or MRMLs getting added to F-15C GE…
Photographic evidence is a strong thing, and has given dozens of NATO aircraft weapons they otherwise might not have. You have to beat photographic evidence, that’s the goalkeeper in this situation.
Not really my fault there’s loads of things to fake due to a large amount of import/export in the west.
yes exactly, that’s why precise sources and proof is important. Different companies handle integration differently and Gaijin shouldn’t just assume what weapons can be carried where without manufacturer info.
It’s not. Same as with the eft they all follow the same rules where we need info for every pylon.
It’s not the same situation tho. You yourself bring up photographic evidence which the 28NM also doesn’t have. We literally have photographic, video and written evidence and sources for up to 4 LMURs on the mi28nm. 8 is a complete guess by Gaijin and nothing else.
Read the comment. I explained to you where the difference is and why one creates problems and the other doesn’t.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I’m a bit too jaded for skill measuring contest these days, ngl
Not to mention it’s off topic
Both are problematic and definitely don’t go hand in hand with all this supposed realism.
Making up excuses goes nowhere.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Both dont go hand in hand with realism that is true. They are balance compromises after all but only one of the 2 creates problems outside of the potential gameplay impact. Thats the problem with the -lets call them non technical artificial buffs - compared to buffs based on technical compatibility. Not that they benefit russia but that they create problems and questions down the line that we simply dont need and that the other kind of buffs dont create.
Just out of curiosity: you know that all of your stats are public, right?
Really? An inappropiate flag for a question?
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
1 Like
I have a skill issue 2026 gang here
when did I flag u must have been the wind then
Thats a no then?
One reason. To make you wait multiple minutes when you and your friend pick different nations.