i never said it couldnt? its the same thing for the 12.0 abrams
It’s the same thing for every TT vehicle in the game, so if those two need to go up because “players suck” then all other vehicles will have to go up as well, basically nullifying BR increase.
its not the same for every tt vehicle in game because a lot simply do just suck, the 11.0 3bm60 slingers dont
It’s the same as they’re operated by the same type of people.
You can’t just say a select few vehicles are being played by bad players, thus needing to go up in BR, while all other vehicles in the same TT apparently aren’t being played by bad players.
Makes zero sense.
Your opinion, not reality.
Then shouldn’t it bear some cost for its OP performance in the past six months? After all, until now its turret’s penetrating ammunition rack has still not exploded, which is still a very serious Russian bias
As the owner of BMPT, I believe there is no need for pity. It should be further nerf
T-72B3 is not 12.0 capable lmao. It’s not even the best 11.3 tank.
Also not even the best 11.0 tank, just a T-90A sidegrade.
Not even close to OP lmao.
Again, it’s decent but far from OP.
Holy cope. Even the Chally 2s are easily better than the T-72B3.
4 Likes
People can’t be bothered to play anything other than top tier. Like come on… Nato has dominant vehicles in other br brackets even in top tier.
worse mobility, armour, round, rof, gun handling, survivability, etc at a higher br and getting a basket next update? i dont think so.
whatever advantage the B3 has going forward is instantly cancelled out by the non existant reverse.
20-30mm pen is hardly a difference maker.
5.3 second reload for the first 4 rounds >>>>> 7 seconds flat.
lmao what? The T-72B3 pops in a single shot 80-90% of the time against any self respecting player. Chally is easily more survivable.
Yeah no shit.
7 Likes
“your right but i dont agree so im gonna make excuses”
5s for 4 rounds vs 7 seconds for the whole game
the relikt destabs any round at an angle and the t72 cant be easily front penned by a 30mm however a challenger can also there survivability when penned is just as terrible but the t72 is more difficult to pen
thats not very nice, i dont think the T72 is infinitely better but it should have never moved down
Lmao
Yep, and the 5s for 4 rounds is incredible for a CQB situation.
The B3s are just dead in the water in a close range situation.
Ok, give me 10 situations where 3BM60 can pen something but L27A1 can’t.
Maybe for autocannons yeah, but it’s laughably easy to pen for main cannons.
2 Likes
and the slow hull turning and gun handling is not
the good gun handling and lack of a nato hump says otherwise
more about post pen than actual pen but now let me guess your gonna say it doesnt matter?
the challenger is still way easier to pen
again not saying its infinitely better but which one is better is debatable and the T72B3 shouldnt be facing 10.3 tanks
Too bad NATO mains doesn’t have this type of players.
4 Likes
I’m glad we can agree that it should be 11.0
1 Like
Every heard about repleneshing first stage? also chally 2 on no first stage is also 7s (ace)
It’s supposed to
Both with 3UBR11 500m
Survivability is way better btw
good luck in an encounter with more than two enemies without running away and losing position. challengers ammo layout is nearly the same as a chieftain (most of the tank is) so it quite easily could be bumped to 15 shells to bring it a little closer to par with the rest.
unfortunately pretty much every dart produced by countries with modern technology have an anti-ERA tip to their darts making things like relikt valueless.
bro really used the only spot on the bottom of a chally with some armour for that.
it will hold up against the 30mm darts (that BMP-2 should be incapable of firing to be accurate) but realistically youve taken the barrel and tracks off the victim in your BMPT instantly
i love that excuse so much, if the first stage is mentioned people say “just replenish it” because of course only we get the luxurys of having to wait for a round to replenish while everything else gets a ready rack of atleast 10+ rounds
your russian cardboard isnt doing that irl.
the fuck does this prove? using the heaviest most armoured challenger and at a weird angle for both
both front on in there lightest config against 30mm
1 Like
@Rzi4628-live Any possibility Challenger 2 11.3? At least that’s what I think. It should be in 11.3BR