So you think Russia CAS is weak?
It’s Alvis, dude. Just mute him and move on. His opinions come straight from whatever YouTuber he was watching before he came on the forums.
Although, Russian CAS is pretty weak. Until you get the Kh-38s and LIMURs.
Now you just trying to find reason to complain this is not objective
1 Like
Or Do you have any opinions on the 40% win rate of the Leopard 2 versus the 60% win rate of Russian tanks? Since spwan CAS would result in losing the game. Does this prove that it has nothing to do with CAS, and that the Leopard 2 and M1 are actually weaker than Russian tanks?
3 Likes
VT4s are so amazing to Gaijin I wouldn’t be surprised if the VT4A1 was the first 13.0 ground vehicle
2 Likes
SBMM can’t work for WT.
It’s that simple.
The game isn’t built for it
3 Likes
Haven’t heard that one yet.
Hmm let’s see, currently up to 16 missiles, F&F, that can’t be smoked.
Balanced fr.
Oh, without a mach 1 launch speed limit.
1 Like
Because the worst truth is the self-made META/BALANCE can’t handle SBMM
Tell me, how will you make SBMM work in conjunction with the battle rating system and stockgrinding as well as the overall grind.
While also allowing for decent queue times for everyone
2 Likes
First they have to level all tank/plane capabilities and full maps rework and game core mechanics first which they won’t gonna do for some reasons
Second, its a ranked game → not casual mode for instant dopamine hits.
ADHD will stick with casual mode for the rest of their time if they can’t wait for a SBMM match.
And Crew grind system are made to binded with monetize system which is should be rightfully removed.
When this SBMM materialised → Stat shark LARP maxxing, ODL, RU BIAS DEVELOPER, DEAD P2W BR are gonna be in shamble
SBMM doesnt work for any game without a proper ladder/ranked system, because generally players dont like a game being the same/higher difficulty even as their own skill increases without some form of reward/gratification.
Exclusive skin camo for certain rank achiever,
→ it would be even on another level of skill-based competition if we see a integrated FACEIT match maker
So you want them to completely remake the game.
1 Like
Holy projection
2 Likes
False. PL-12s were nerfed cause of gaijin attempting to fix an issue with their energy retention, and it had nothing to do with Russian players. AIM-120s were and still are better than base R-77s imo, and they only got R-77-1s because of how weak R-77s were.
2 Likes
Playerbase skill differences.
That’s what happens in nation vs nation matchmaking.
It’s why if you check arcade win rates, it’s not in such disparity.
If Soviet tanks are so much better than NATO tanks as Russian shills always claim, why is there no evidence?
1 Like
I’m just asking you, if you don’t consider Russian air operations but instead believe that using Russian tanks more extensively would actually be more advantageous, then how do you conclude that the M1 and Leopard 2 are superior to Russian tanks? AB is not within the scope of discussion, as the topic of Russian bias primarily concerns the imbalance between opposing forces
Factional conflict is not an incorrect game mode, but a one-sided superiority situation within this mode is indeed wrong.
Don’t try to deceive people by using the skills of the players. You cannot define the strength or weakness of millions of people unless you deliberately discriminate against NATO players from the very beginning
Or maybe its a certain type of vehicle (or more the lack of it) that most people here complain about which works completely differently in arcade?
Dude, Soviet players are just Abrams players [not literally, just figuratively] of 2019 - 2022.
Playerbases shift.
People get bored & quit/switch tech trees.
New players of new skills choose different tech trees.
There are ten-millions of players.
I do a cross analysis of tanks which prove superiority.
Science means taking the player out of the analysis, because that adds too many skill based factors.
M1A1 fires a better round than T-90M, let alone the better Abrams.
Abrams are far more mobile than T-80BVM which itself is far more mobile than T-90M.
Armor has not been meta at top BR since Strv 122’s weakspots were dissected, & despite that Abrams has good armor.
So it’s all mobility, ammo, & reload.
Armor is nice; I’ve bounced rounds off my M1A1, T-90M, Leopard 2A5, etc; but it was due to my failure of not getting first shot off or failing to aim that allowed them to shoot me in the first place.
The people that form their tactics around the survivability onion perform better in matches [on average] with all tanks than those who rely on armor in their Strv 122s & T-90M.
1 Like