Russian Bias in 2026?

[SadRIPer]

Funny how you’re evading my valid arguments when they don’t fit your “Russia = better fantasy”, as you did when I was talking about the power system modules added to NATO MBTs (you didn’t argue the point, conveniently), and as you’re doing rn not arguing the added modules present for NATO but not for Russia/China, the paper NATO MBT armors still not improved, the absence of improved hull armor on the Sep V3 and the useless turret armor added to it (making it heavier more than anything else, completely useless to grind btw).

Very, very funny. Everybody understand you’re biased man

[SadRIPer]

They land exactly at the same place man, how is that a proper nerf ?

As long as they don’t hit random cannons/commander mgs/tracks/engine as Spikes/MMPs/PARS/JAGMs already do, I don’t consider them balanced compared to those lol

Only advantage to that new lobe modeling is LMURs can MAYBE hit obstacles in front of NATO MBTs, but that’s it. If it hits the top of the tank each time, it doesn’t change anything at all

[PiatkaRubl]

@MiGoon_Fox-3

Ah yes, truly the most overpowered tank in the game

Can’t take anyone complaining that the ZTZ series are “overpowered” seriously. I can’t comment on the T-90M since i haven’t unlocked it yet but from what i’ve seen, the tank isn’t that overpowered at all too

@SadRIPer

Are you on Kremlin’s payroll my man ?

Outright ridiculous, get a grip…

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@SadRIPer

, as you did when I was talking about the power system modules added to NATO MBTs (you didn’t argue the point, conveniently)

I was eating

Be patient you clown

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

Russia received internal modules first for lights and MBTs (2S38 and autoloader) before NATO did.

Even before the autoloader module was added people were complaining about spall being eaten by fuel tanks (which all nations’ fuel tanks do) and shells.

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@SadRIPer

Are you on Kremlin’s payroll my man ?

I am unemployed currently, so no money I’m afraid

@SadRIPer

They land exactly at the same place man, how is that a proper nerf ?

The loft angle?
not to mention the warhead being nerfed from SAP-HE to just HE.
omfg you’re dense

@PiatkaRubl

Can’t take anyone complaining that the ZTZ series are “overpowered” seriously. I can’t comment on the T-90M since i haven’t unlocked it yet but from what i’ve seen, the tank isn’t that overpowered at all too

It was irony

@SadRIPer

Ok russian main

You shill Russian vehicles as better than they actually are in-game.
With biased statements and made-up facts.

@SadRIPer

FCS also makes you unable to shoot, reload or move the turret on Leclercs.

@SadRIPer

How russian biased can you be by saying modules is more a buff than a nerfed to NATO MBTs lmaoooo.

- YouTube

Spall is reduced, means you take less actual damage. All for a what? 8 second repair (literally unplayable)? Just like how the “Magik op bs” Russian autoloader/shells do (except the autoloader takes much longer to repair)

And as I proved to you already with the leclerc, taking out the FCS does not disable your ability to reload, shoot or move the turret at all. It just takes out thermals and stabiliser. (This is for MBTs, lights and SPAA are different for some reason)

[БЕИ]

@SadRIPer

Your point being ? I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say

You don’t understand anything at all bro

[Fat_Fury]

@MiGoon_Fox-3

The loft angle?

they hti the same spot makes no difference at all… still a one shot kill vs others which require sometimes 4 to kill…

@MiGoon_Fox-3

You shill Russian vehicles as better than they actually are in-game.

I wonder why there are hundreads of posts claiming what he says but only 4 of you who defend this ? same people alvis motorola you and piatka…

I wonder why turrets in russian tanks don’t fly as often then in some videos from irl lol

@MiGoon_Fox-3

prob because Relikt is newer but whatever.

does that mean they should add it to a point being very strong with low to no data? where is the balance in it?

@MiGoon_Fox-3

the winrates are NOT due to the T-90M

winrates are due to the fact of multiple russian vehicles outperfoming others now add the spawm of it and the winrates are explained…

Spikes/MMPs are broken
BMPTs are broken, no need to develop here
Pantsir-S1 currently best SACLOS SPAA in the game (12 ready-to-fire missiles, multi targeting system). Let’s not even talk about the next Pantsir… )

To shoot at russian MBTs, gotta go pixelhunting. Urban debris on the ground ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT does zigzags ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT has bushes all over UFP ? Good luck shooting at driver’s port/breach (especially when you have the blur motion on, and that those bushes will “melt” with the tank’s armor in a blurry weird way). You shoot at russian MBTs from far away ? Good luck, gotta go pixel hunting. NATO MBTs in comparaison ? You point, click and shoot. Simple, easy.

IFVs : russians have IFVs with much higher fire rate, laser accuracy, 2 cannons (1 main for HE/ATGMs, 1 autocannon), much faster than some wheeled NATO IFVs. NATO IFVs in comparaison ? Bushmaster, completely garbage.

People submit bug reports with actual EVIDENCE, time, and effort put into them—and what happens? The people responsible for reviewing them come back with some of the most downright ridiculous responses imaginable. And no, I’m not slandering anyone—I’m calling it exactly how it is.
<— abrams armor etc…

America has gotten 2 SPAA in the past year and a half
France has gotten 1
Italy, Sweden, Israel, and Japan have gotten 2 or less
And Russia?

2 Shilkas
Tor-M2
BUK-M3
And now another Pantsir
At what point does this stop? Why is one nation constantly getting stacked while others are left behind? < — with the new target switch mechanic the new pantsir will be bery good at defeating stealtjh helis while other nations won’t do anything … just waste 8 missiles and ur done

And then there’s the BMPT. What were you even thinking?

Germany is still missing a huge portion of its Boxer vehicles
America still doesn’t have multiple Stryker variants
Other nations are just sitting there waiting
WHERE IS THE DAMN FGM-148 ???

/BTW Show me actual sources for the Su-30SM specifically. Not the MKK, not the MKM, not the MKI, not the SM2—the Su-30SM. I can almost guarantee you can’t, because half the stuff being represented feels like it’s pulled from other variants or straight-up theoretical configurations.

You added the AGM-154 ONLY to the new F-16—WHY??? Every top-tier U.S. aircraft in the game is capable of carrying it.

[小小格温大受影响]

@GoodKittyOwner

Russian mbt’s had autoloaders modelled

”Russian mbt’s had autoloaders modelled“

So are you going to start arguing Obj 292 is soider manually loaded next?

[MotorolaCRO]

@Fat_Fury

does that mean they should add it to a point being very strong with low to no data? where is the balance in it?

Tanks consist out of more things than just armor.

@Fat_Fury

BMPTs are broken, no need to develop here

At 11.7 they are far from broken, especially with incoming accuracy nerf.

@Fat_Fury

NATO MBTs in comparaison ? You point, click and shoot. Simple, easy.

What a statement considering NATO had a more armored tank for half a decade now.

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@Fat_Fury

they hti the same spot makes no difference at all… still a one shot kill vs others which require sometimes 4 to kill…

-_-

Loft angle was nerfed, which you all wanted, as well as the warhead.
You get what you want and then you just go and ignore it.
No wonder the game is so horribly unbalanced everywhere

@Fat_Fury

I wonder why there are hundreads of posts claiming what he says but only 4 of you who defend this ? same people alvis motorola you and piatka…

90% of those posts from from players who aren’t even positive KD

@Fat_Fury

BMPTs are broken, no need to develop here

KD and KS are suggesting otherwise

@Fat_Fury

Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT does zigzags ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT has bushes all over UFP ?

drivers port is ez shot, simply use the position of the barrel as a guide if there are bushes.
you can also easily shoot the turret roof

@Fat_Fury

And then there’s the BMPT. What were you even thinking?

PUMA 2.0, we have experienced this before.
I believe the F-14 can also be argued to have done the same thing, for even longer

@Fat_Fury

Show me actual sources for the Su-30SM specifically. Not the MKK, not the MKM, not the MKI, not the SM2—the Su-30SM. I can almost guarantee you can’t, because half the stuff being represented feels like it’s pulled from other variants or straight-up theoretical configurations.

It’s incredibly difficult to even find sources on Russian things because it’s all filled with western nonsense most of the time (took me forever to find just a flight manual for the MiG-29 in Russian and a full download of the German one)

[Ion_492]

@SadRIPer

It’s not the point. The point is : they favorize eastern nations, including China, by not giving them modules, while every other NATO nations get them.

I wish had a bias towards China.

China’s best MBT is American.
Their domestic MBTs are not great.
Their fixed wing CAS isn’t stellar, their rotary wing CAS is on par with non Russian nations.
They don’t have a single competitive plane above 14.0, and their best 14.0+ plane is French.
Their main ARH missile murdered and is now arguably the worst modern ARH in the entire game.

The fact they aren’t getting modules isn’t indicative of any sort of bias whatsoever.

[_Renzo]

@Fat_Fury

wonder why there are hundreads of posts claiming what he says but only 4 of you who defend this

Bad players generally outnumber good players by quite a significant margin. This isn’t exclusive to WT though.

[小小格温大受影响]

@MotorolaCRO

At 11.7 they are far from broken, especially with incoming accuracy nerf.

As long as the BMPT turret ammunition rack doesn’t explode when pierced, it will always be a Russian bias

[Fat_Fury]

@MiGoon_Fox-3

Loft angle was nerfed, which you all wanted, as well as the warhead.
You get what you want and then you just go and ignore it.

still 20 kg of explosives one hit any tank…

@MiGoon_Fox-3

90% of those posts from from players who aren’t even positive KD

Fat_Fury:

KD does not mean someone can’t point out facts and prove it… KD is a lame argument :)

@MiGoon_Fox-3

KD and KS are suggesting otherwise

now show entire RF win rate…

@MiGoon_Fox-3

drivers port is ez shot, simply use the position of the barrel as a guide if there are bushes.

sure thing bubba only when the tank is frontaly to you and looking at you slight angle and ur off

@MotorolaCRO

Tanks consist out of more things than just armor.

yeah true but still easy to one shot vs hard to one shot which one has a higher chance of winning?

@MotorolaCRO

At 11.7 they are far from broken, especially with incoming accuracy nerf.

no they are not… if so then why are they so popular?

@MotorolaCRO

What a statement considering NATO had a more armored tank for half a decade now.

sure thing xD just guess the weakspots which are a big target compared to russians now with added relikt xD

[MotorolaCRO]

Sorry but no.

[Rafale和歼-10C百合]

@Fat_Fury

Good luck, gotta go pixel hunting. NATO MBTs in comparaison ? You point, click and shoot. Simple, easy.

So true sis

[MotorolaCRO]

@Fat_Fury

yeah true but still easy to one shot vs hard to one shot which one has a higher chance of winning?

Can’t tell you because you haven’t provided enough information.

@Fat_Fury

no they are not… if so then why are they so popular?

They aren’t even so popular anymore.
Click-Bait had more battles in May.

@Fat_Fury

sure thing xD

My dude Sweden had uparmored Leopards since 2020 iirc.

[Kievskiy_Minipig]

@SadRIPer

It’s not the point. The point is : they favorize eastern nations, including China, by not giving them modules, while every other NATO nations get them.

United Kingdom of Eastern Britain and Eastern Ireland approves this statement considering challengers got no baskets iirc.

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@SadRIPer

they favorize eastern nations

What about Japan?

What about cough PL-12 nerfs cough care to comment on that?