If it was up to me it would have been added together with the 2A7V about 2.5 years ago.
SEPV2 is the closest thing to the 2A7. SEPV3 in my opinion would be too OP for it to be added at the same time as the 2A7
Keep in mind that the SEPv2 only got the 5 second reload because the 2A7V stomped it into the ground so hard. When both released the SEPv2 was simply a worse 2A7 in every way.
If they had released the SEPv3 alongside the 2A7V the Abrams likely wouldn’t have gotten (or needed) the reload buff, still making it balanced.
Most players don’t have ACED crew though. That would take so much time the stats wouldn’t be affected by the monthly I just pulled
Expert reload still makes it 5.3 seconds vs 6.3-6.4 seconds of the Leo 2s so yes that is still a full second faster.
The SEPv2 with a 6 second ace reload like it used to be absolutely got stomped by the 2A7V. It was so hilariously worse it wasn’t even funny. It didn’t have a single useful advantage over the 2A7V.
The 5-5.3 second reload is the only thing keeping the Abrams stats up.
Abrams expert crew with maxed out reload crews is around 5.3 seconds, at Ace only sped up by .3 which is at 5.0. Barely noticeable differences.
I don’t know, I think abrams has a very steep learning curve compared to LEOs. LEOs in game have the easiest time compared to all other nations and it still performs okay. A reload does help but I don’t think it’s a big game changer and even expert crew is expensive and tedious at top tier.
Let’s compare the SEPv2 how it released with a 6 second reload with the 2A7V:
- Firepower: 2A7V
- Mobility: 2A7V (Since the SEPv2 was still forced to carry TUSK II then)
- Armor: 2A7V by a longshot
- Survivability: 2A7V by a longshot
Give me a single useful advantage that the SEPv2 had on release in 2023.
From those none, but even so if we look at the type 10/tkx that also only has reload of the abrams it performs a lot better because most who use it already have the learning curve down.
To me the leo is the best beginner friendly tank compared to any nation. You get everything and the Abrams isn’t that.
Now i see it, thank you for dumbing it down.
You do realize that sim actually uses the same vehicles as grb does, right?
The statistics are shared with the air battles lol of course they’re not going to boast insane kds. And of course you don’t know how they would impact games considering you don’t even have a single plane over rank 3.
Yeah and I’d wish there was a topic with minimum IQ requirements so we could discuss balance while being spared from certified troglodytes like you.
Hey now, I was asking to walk this bloke for 100 top-tier battles to document whether this guvnah live up to his claims.
Good luck with that, the kid is rank 7 with tanks only but wants to lecture people on how CAS is not affecting top tier games at all.
After those 100 games hes gonna need a puppet to show us where the LMURs touched him.
Can you realize the difference between YOU NOT INTERACTING WITH SIM AT ALL and ME FACING CAS IN REALISTIC BATTLES I ALSO PLAY A LOT.
I state my opinion based on my experience interacting with CAS in rb and you state your opinion on sim on what? Nothing? Zero?
Too much of skill issue to name at least one worthy argument
I can bet you need hope for it at least to be not one number
Your experience which ends at rank 7, goes against the experience of 99% of people in this forum, against statistical evidence and doesnt entail any experience at playing CAS or SPAA yourself. Yeah nah thanks
There have been numerous arguments why and how CAS affects games but you gotta read and actually understand those which seems to be a problem for you.
130 is one number
The word youre looking for is digit
big brain
Its not like there more than one sim bracket with easy tendency that can be tracked - but seems 130 IQ is not enough for that.
Where? You didn’t show any. You literally posted none of statistics
Oh, the famous “we are forum, we are the power here”, and then forum finds out most of players hate big maps and favour small ones unlike them
Words, feelings, experience, bias not equal argument. Learn what argument is
My argument 64% with abrams 12.0 from January contradicts all of your “arguments”
Jfc we know how sim brackets work but the point is still that you havent touched any higher tier vehicles than rank 7 and therefore you making statements about them based on your experience is utterly useless.
Whos personal experience is worth more, the one from a guy sometimes playing against it or the guys who play against it while also playing as it?
You can look at statshark yourself. Winrate swings correlate perfectly with new powerful additions that are in fact not MBTs but SPAA and CAS only for the past 1,5 years.
No its the famous there are dozens of people here with different skill levels, exprience and tech trees whose combined opinion has more credibility than one bloke.
Thats literally not an argument since its only your stats which are completely useless in the grander aspect of all games played.
You should rather learn what an argument is and how data and statistics work.
What statement did I make that involves specifically only rank 7?
I repeat again. Where are statistics showing CAS dominance over ground vehicles in RB?
No, it’s probably the smallest part of community you can ever think of
You seem completely lost in discussion
After you learn how to do at least two kills average before dying in top tier. Seems age of account has nothing to do with player learning how to play)




