Russian winrates are decreased when teamed up with NATO nations, and NATO winrates are increased when teamed up with Russia, hence the 54% winrate for Russia instead of the real 60-90% you very intelligent man
That’s why Russia + China have had nearly 90% winrate at top tier ground sim BR for years now. Because they’re only facing NATO, every time. You’re either not very smart, or refuse to think because you’re heavily biased towards Russia lol.
I always have trouble intercepting a salvo of LMURs when in a sky sabre, the new pansir is definetly better against munitions, plus the velocity of that msl is crazy
So, you’re saying that you:
A: don’t have a source
B: don’t have any actual argument so now you’re desperately making stuff up
Stop making stuff up to get people into believing you.
Nope, Russia and China have that winrate in top tier sim because Russian CAS is 10x more oppressive in sim than in RB. That has always been the main driving force for Russian top tier sim winrates for years.
Just because some people don’t just take the numbers you pull out of your ass as facts doesn’t mean they aren’t intelligent.
In fact it’s the opposite, questioning numbers with no basis and asking for a source is a good thing.
You have excellent mobility, reload, thermals + ess as well as smoke shells
Very versatile setup.
Better than T-80s at the same br
Kinda on par with 2A4s in terms of how good it is
You didn’t even use it single time how do you know it doesn’t matter ? Do you have any proof to that statement ?
Nobody goes around saying the leo2a4 is op
Not op, but easily the shared best 10.7 MBT alongside the M1.
The T-80B closes the gap a bit more now with the reload buff, but still not fully up there with the 2A4 and M1.
Best 10.7 mbt for me is vickers mk7 and challenger mk.3, these two beat the m1 or lea2a7 any day
Vickers…
Challenger…
Huh?
There is actually some logic to it.
IF we assume that the small sample size data somewhere here is correct by which Germany is most often paired with russia in top tier then you can actually reason that if russia was not as often paired with the lowest winrate tech tree then their ”solo" winrate would be higher and vice versa Germanys would be lower. Except if there was some factor where putting together Germany and russia makes russia better and Germany worse.
But like I said we don’t have big sample size data for nation pairing and no solo winrates so actually reliably calculating the impact is impossible
fr try it, britian 10.7 is one of my favorite lineups (before the bmpt came along) the l26 on the chally pens a lot and the vickers has both firepower and mobility
It would be a logical argument if there was data to reliably back it up
But we don’t
So it’s an incredibly dumb point to make as of right now
Riight
Russia has been completely nerfed, and it’s been that way for a while. Back in the day, the KV2, KV1, and IS2 were terrors in matches; today they’re just another light tank.
The Vickers Mk.7 is a decent pick since it has better mobility than the 2A4, better firepower but a worse turret profile and arguably worse survivability.
Chally Mk.3 is a solid 10.7 but in no way better overall than the 2A4 and M1.
No it’s a valid assumption based on the limited data we have.
It’s of course not a definitive argument like he wants it to be.
A guess is not necessarily dumb.
Vickers actually feels way more survivable from the lack of a turret basket
I mean, fair enough.
Either way I’m not going to consider it as a valid argument
