The issue is that there is no device able to bypass limitations set by developer. There is certain range beyond which vehicles do not render and this value is set by developer for all devices. Just like in case of tanks popping from nowhere or tanks having not sound, you cannot solve this by changing device.
Also forgot to mention tickrate issues where tank seems to be in one spot while actually being in another spot. Anyone who ever used bullpup knows what I mean. You cant get rid of this by getting better device.
1 Like
Sounds like a skill issue on your part
1 Like
You’re stats shaming him and you can’t even see the Leos winrates are stupidly low, and the higher BR it is the lowest the winrate in result (2A4 : 43.8% → 2a7v : 38.4%).
You don’t understand Russia has the bias at top tier grb and wins large majority of the games, resulting in NATO teams simply leaving after 1 death by frustration/waves of deaths NATO side because they concede huge and quick losses every game, with russian vehicles running over them and spawnkilling them every single time.
The bad winrates AND THUS the bad k/d going alongside them IN CONSEQUENCE are not because of the players, but because of the trash NATO vehicles WT give NATO nations.
Large majority of the player base queue Russia at top tier grb, it’s not a coincidence. Everybody understand Russia has favoritism in this game
It happens to russian MBTs way more often.
NATO MBTs are paper, easily crippled from any shot to the turret basket, inexistant/non performant trunnion, fcs, bad side armor and the rest.
Russia is just more favorized in this game, that is a fact
WR being low is the fault of the player.
54% is a large majority? Its certainly not bad, and is relatively good by WT standards, but lets not act like it is impossible to win against Russia. Yes, NATO players tend to leave a lot, but when they cant get into CAS they leave themselves.
NATO vehicles are not trash. They are among the best in the game, if not the best.
They flock to Russia because CAS FOTM meta.
54% is a large majority? Its certainly not bad, and is relatively good by WT standards, but lets not act like it is impossible to win against Russia. Yes, NATO players tend to leave a lot, but when they cant get into CAS they leave themselves.
It’s not 54% in reality, because the russian winrates go down when teamed up with NATO nations such as the U.S. or Germany.
If only teamed up with China, they win 60-90% of the games, as showed in ground sim (where Russia and China are basically always teamed up together against whole NATO).
WR being low is the fault of the player.
Not it’s not. When your team is loosing and everybody is leaving, it’s basically you VS the whole 16 russian team → basically means you’re gonna die and your winrate is gonna go down.
Also, as NATO teams largely loose every top tier grb games, it means they always get pushed in caps and in their positions and die, so that also makes the NATO winrates go down as well.
Your winrates don’t mater in any way in this argument, I’m just looking at the global NATO winrates at top tier, which are for all nations ridiculously low compared to russian winrates.
Which means there is something wrong in the russian/NATO techtree, and that the game is unbalanced in favor of Russia, for the large majority of players.
They flock to Russia because CAS FOTM meta.
Nobody cares about the difference in CAS performance in GRB, they all basically destroy tanks very easily (except for LMURs vs JAGMs), it’s not the reason why people choose to play Russia.
Majority of people play top tier Russia because Russia wins every time because they’re favorized everywhere : helis jets IFVs MBTs SPAAs BMPT Ships
I don’t want to hear your schizophrenic data claims.
Ground sim is an entirely different gamemode, where you can first spawn CAS and thus people who don’t have the “skill” to get the SP for CAS in RB go spam it in sim. Only other people who play it are larpers.
That is rarely the case. You have plenty of 1dlers at times but if you pull your weight you can win a majority of your games. The player in question is the 1dler, doing half as well as the global average in a tank and you wonder why his WR is low. Instead of being beneficial to the team he is feeding the enemy spawnpoints by going negative.
They don’t lose a large portion of top tier games. They lose slightly more than they win. About 5% more losses than wins.
I’m showing how its possible to win a large majority of games with NATO vehicles. Its easier to carry a team with a NATO tank than it is an RU one.
People do. KH-38MT slingers are easier to play than NATO fixed-wing CAS. The Helis are on relatively equal footing when comparing 64E to 28NM and 10ME. Not to mention RU MBTs and BMPT are rather low skill floor so people like them, even though their potential is low.
Helis: Equal across all nations that have LDIRCM Helis.
Jets: Better fixed wing CAS than NATO nations (arguably)
IFVs: What? BMP-2M is one of the worse top tier IFVs.
MBTs: What? Russian tanks are among the worst in the game.
SPAAs: Russia has one of the best top tier AAs I’d say.
BMPT: Fodder to MBTs that have a brain.
Ships: I don’t play naval
So at top tier, they are ahead in SPAA and fixed-wing CAS, and not too ahead of other nations.
2 Likes
12?
ok?
USA gets 16
MiG-29 vs let’s say F-18s, the early and A variants are both the best in their brackets, all F-18s don’t suffer from channel loss and the F-18A is undertiered as hell.
missing the correct CM count (the it is modelled correctly in the files, but gaijin literally slapped the wrong CM dispenser on top)
Russian tanks are just low skill floor, not actually good
3 Likes
US winrate in 10.0+ vs russian winrate in 10.0+
Enough said.
2 Likes
Just because people don’t know how to use a lineup doesn’t mean the vehicles are bad, or aren’t competitive.
Compare what’s comparable you dishonest man, they have 192 rockets with the Mi-8TV at 8.0 and 128 with the Mi-24A at 8.7 (absurd biased amount), while the U.S. only have 76 of them with all their 8 and 8.7 helis.
missing the correct CM count (the it is modelled correctly in the files, but gaijin literally slapped the wrong CM dispenser on top)
Nobody cares about that, they literally have 2 squad top tier jets available, while no other NATO nation has 2 lol. Big favoritism, that’s what it is.
Russian tanks are just low skill floor, not actually good*
Call that whaever you want, bottom line : the market aka large majority of players choose to play Russia at top tier grb, because they know what the META is and simply play the META to win (and they indeed win, because every top tier grb BR is green for Russia).
Stop trying to find a hard explanation to this, Russia performs better just because it’s better, that’s all
I don’t want to hear your schizophrenic data claims.
You don’t want to hear the truth, they win large majority of top tier grb games, around 60 to 80% of them.
Play 100 11.7 GRB games as NATO and show us the results.
Ground sim is an entirely different gamemode
China is the most played nation after Russia at 12.7-13.0 GRB when you look at the queing, these days even before the U.S. and Germany. So no it’s not exclusive to ground sim, people simply know Russia and China are the most META nations at top tier lol.
That is rarely the case. You have plenty of 1dlers at times but if you pull your weight you can win a majority of your games.
Ok Superman, you’re the best player out there, you even win 1 vs 48.
They don’t lose a large portion of top tier games. They lose slightly more than they win. About 5% more losses than wins.
False and dishonest, it only takes 1 day to somebody to see he looses large majority of 13.0 GRB games against Russia, all day long. Same for 11.7. Saying otherwise is pure dishonesty.
I’m showing how its possible to win a large majority of games with NATO vehicles. Its easier to carry a team with a NATO tank than it is an RU one.
Again nobody cares about your personnal experience, I’m looking at what the player base is experiencing → and what the NATO player base is experiencing is pain and large losses at top tier grb.
IFVs: What? BMP-2M is one of the worse top tier IFVs.
Russian IFVs are largely better than NATO IFVs and their bushmaster because faster fire rate + way more accurate + more mobile
Helis: Equal across all nations that have LDIRCM Helis.
Tigers and AHs = Mi-28NMs and their perfectly modeled LMURs ? Lol ok, no need to argue further, I think troll + ragebait
BMPT: Fodder to MBTs that have a brain.
Yeah ok that’s what I thought, russian bot says there is nothing wrong with BMPT. Almost got me here
Yes it does, because saying U.S. players are complete morons in their large majority is dumb and false.
So only other meaning : U.S. have garbage vehicles.
1 Like
You are literally saying the same thing lmao.
Just go play Animal Crossing or something at this point.
1 Like
Because 1 is true and the other isn’t lol
And taking in consideration the fact russian vehicles are the most ez vehicles to play…
Wow. Once every ten years. And I have this problem against Soviet MBTs in every battle.
2 Likes
Hey now, no call out people
:(
So just have fun at the match making mercy?
Does IFV rhyme with best or worse??? They are just IFVs
Yeah, even with their hand-held damage models and munition options
Basically every RU tank player is a professional paralympic athlete.
2 Likes
Dishonest man ? Literally comparing C-5K to Mighty mouse like they equal missiles you being dishonest here.