If your definition of very fast is equal to bein faster than throwing rocks with your bare hands I got news for you.
Jaguar sits at higher br because of F&F missiles, its speed and features, cannon is not one of them.
Which is funny considering you barely achieve 1 K/D ratio with NATO ifv’s (in fact you have less then 1 Ajax) while you happily sit 1+ K/D ratio in BMPT, makes me wonder.
Russian weakspots are more tricky due to volumetric issues, since those weakspots are generally smaller it can mess up your shot more regularly.
Not gonna even talk about how Russian trunnions somehow offers more protection than other tanks trunnions, hell even more than some composite armor.
Depends, if you correctly believe that LDIRCM can in fact not unequivocally affect all types of IR guided missiles then its only a 50% russian bias issue.
If you believe Gaijin that LDIRCM can in fact dazzle all types of IR missiles then its 100% a russian bias issue plain and simply due to the position of the emitter on the MI28NM
ALL helis with LDIRCM overperform just the same as each other, this part isn’t Russia bias as there’s two other nations with LDIRCM that’s overperforming just as much
Plain and simply not true. All LDIRCM helis probably overperform when it comes to dazzling modern IR missiles but only russia gets one where the emitters position is so gravely different to the affected area.
It depends on who that “everybody” is, if they all bustas like you then what’s the point of having all those knowledges you claims you have that leads yall to nowhere?
Oh boy trying to shittalk my stats now.
First of all nobody denies that BMPT sits top of the line currently, we were talking about BMPM though and second Ajax is my go to CAS light tank, because it’s the only valuable choice for britain and i only played it at 13.0.
Jaguar is also a lot better then the Ajax. Which you can also see in my stats since i played it 99% at 13.0 as well.
“Trash fm”
Literally what???
All of the Russian planes are faster and have better sustained turn rates at combat speeds. Not to mention better missiles that don’t give a rip about miltipathing at all. Plus hms allowing you to hold a notch/multipath without moving the nose to get a radar lock. You are lying to yourself if you think russias planes were in anyway disadvantaged especially in nuclear thunder. The scoreboard stats for every game say completely otherwise and so do the win rate stats. Russia was dominating almost every nuclear thunder game.
At the upper bracket sure the Mig-29 was dominating, but at the lower bracket it entirely came down to player skill. The majority of players on the US side were absolutely idiotic and were players who had never touched jets at all, let alone any of the mechanics at that BR. I was doing extremely well in an A-10C simply because I knew what I was doing.
“Mig-29s with trash FM”
It’s objectively the worst 4th gen airframe by a considerable margin.
F-15 and F-16 clown on the Mig-29 in every flight performance metric apart from maybe top speed or acceleration.
They weren’t. The top bracket was fairly equal performance wise, but the fact that the US is a more popular tree, has 3 times as many usable aircraft, and much more popular usable aircraft led to the one sided queues. In the lower bracket Mig-23s and Su-24s were good, but the Phantom wasn’t that bad, and the F-4J/S was by far the best aircraft for it.
I only played the lower bracket, but I noticed most of the dogfighting occurred right behind the frontline on the Russian side, which brought the SPAA systems into play more often. I could see where the domination effect could come into play when it’s not being fought in a neutral area of the map.
I wouldn’t even call it a fair comparison between the two considering one tank despite having better missiles and the APFSDS round, is worse due to it having no armor whatsoever because its a light tank meaning everything can kill.
While the other only has APDS and worse missiles but I consider better because of the amount of armor the BMPTs have, the two 30mm it gets (Im aware that only one can fire at a time but still), and a crew less turret which the BMP-2M doesn’t have.
This is especially true if you study where you get shot.
I once did a study playing T-80BVM, and all tech tree players except American players would correctly hit side armor and turret.
Abrams players for whatever reason would shoot UFP when the turret and side armor were easier shots.
Of course, 40 matches isn’t the biggest sample size, but it’s astonishing how many people deliberately aim for the thickest armor then complain their shots don’t pen.
“I shot the turret cheek of Abrams and it didn’t pen! It’s OP!” level argument.
Edit:
True and the ammo belt leading into the 30mm guns also having the model separated from the outside belt to the inside belt making ammo detonation hard for that too
