Id rather have that than needing to keep line of sight on a tank in 11.0+
With certain NATO IFVs, you actually have to “keep line of sight” as well with their FnF missiles, because they have a “flat” launcher which isn’t angled upwards (the ebrc jaguar’s launcher is angled upwards while the Freccia OWS 30’s launcher isn’t for example).
You can’t launch a FnF missile over a hill or a rock with the launchers which aren’t angled upwards, so you basically have to see the ennemy in front of you with your eyes and are as screwed as a russian IFV
In NATO’s case it transcribes to Fire and Fail Assault Gambling Mechanic.
I’d much rather take ATGM that does something (for example overpressure damage) than a bunch of those flying farts.
No, they arent. Bugged piece of substance in current state. Not only they stopped to lock drones but now they also struggle to launch despite having lock on enemies. I spent like minute or two being unable to launch missile at locked ka50. Same goes for tanks.
Not saying Id go for bmp2m, bmp2m is one of worst ifvs in game. Cv9040b/c or bill - those are decent ifvs and their gun/missile fires when you want it to fire unlike spikes which devs keep breaking each patch.
Is this mechanic working as intended or it’s bugged? I have problems with not being able to fire spikes on locked target and sometimes SPAA did the same thing, red circle but no matter how many times i tabbed the button it just won’t fire.
It’s a matter of who sees who first.
A Jaguar deletes a BMP as fast, if not faster, than the other way around.
This is exactly the mindset which loses you games. “Muh i was teached from my Tigor and Panzer 4 that i can’t push and only snipe. Oh i died and we don’t have any caps, lets just leave”.
Have you tried to not push a point with your IFV and die then ?
It’s almost like not every vehicle is the same in the game. Also how many Nato IFV even have foldable launchers ? The bradley’s and some of the early CV90.
The rest has spikes, which can destroy all Russian IFV, inculding terminators.
LFP, breach, idler wheels, driver ports, roof. Such tricky weakspot.
If you miss a tank pushing around a corner thats a skill issue. In 99% of the time the guy pushing will die if you don’t f up.
Which is why nato tanks are actually better for “corner fighting” because the trick is to reverse in an angle to get a shot, which Russian tanks can’t do due amazing reverse speed.
There is this insane device called a mouse. You can move it in an upwards trajectory and launch missiles over a hill. Pretty amazing.
Its quite slow compared to most Russian autocannons.
Correcting lead mistake requires much less effort with Russian autocannons thanks to ROF.
Simply bs claim, BMP2M straight up shreds Jaguar much faster because ROF difference.
Seems like someone talks with pure estimations.
F&F missiles on NATO ifv’s doesnt do shit 8/10 times while kornet missile can easily cripple/destroy you, granted those missiles doesnt require LOS and thats the only advantage they have.
You can also cover yourself with smoke against those missiles while kornet or any other LOS missile just simply doesnt care.
Oh look same weakspots you can find on NATO tanks, in fact its even worse due to certain NATO vehicles has also giant artificial turret ring weakspot/armor holes.
So what ? It’s still a very fast firing autocannon with way more pen than the Russian ones.
It’s one of the best autocannons in the game, with the only downside beeing the limited ammo.
That is true, and rarely even needed since you won’t go full speed and shoot over long distances anyway.
The key here is who engages first will win, doesn’t matter if you sit in a BMP or a Jaguar.
I will take the Jaguar over a BMP2M any day of the week. Which is why it sits at a higher BR.
Yes, my estimation of playing both sides.
Exactly, the same weakspots all around, you can always shoot the same places, so tricky.
And yes some Nato MBT’s have very bad weakspots and armor holes, which has nothing to with his claim of “tricky” Russian weakspots.
NATO DART entirely eaten by biased russian ERAs. Broken game.
Also, notice how out of 3 games, the 2 first games were blatant and ez wins for Russia (the first one was actually won thanks to goated Jon and his skills, but otherwise it would have been a loss as every NATO teammates already died and left).
Noticed how he systematically has to take 3 french MBTs per game, without even getting a nuke ? He struggles more than usual, because of the overpowered strenght of Russia at top top tier GRB.
So sad the path this game has taken.
EDIT : also at 14m58s, you can see he shoots, the DART takes out driver + fuel + autoloader. The autoloader ate everything without even exploading (it’s a freaking side shot). Russian MBTs are artificially buffed like crazy
EDIT 2 : the 3rd and last game is won because he had RUSSIA on his side lmaooo, I didn’t even notice. So basically it’s like 3 blatant losses, even with Jon on your side. Very BALANCED game
EDIT 3 : at 15m30s, Jon says “I’m pissed off. Playing against Russia… It’s just sad that Russia can dominate like that because they just get the most bs things ever, at this BR. This pisses me off”.
LMAOOO even him admits there is a blatant bias at this BR!!
nahh i do not agree because of the cannon accuracy which is better which makes top tier tanks lose barrels faster.
well the 2s38 and bmp2m can shread it faster then it can shread bmp’s…
soo you have that which does not gurantee a kills while you can just peek with the turrent and get a one shot killl with the atgm’s the russians have? nahh dude you tripping…
Ahh yes like the ERA does not erase some apfsds because of “reasons” and the bmpt and other ifv’s erase your barrels faster then you blink but skilll issue xDDD i forgot that you are just like alvis in some posts…
you fail to notice that russians win because of mixed warfare with CAS and helicopter support… that makes the smaller and agile in forward motion tanks well preppared to rush
spikes miss or don’t deal damage because they hit something not vital… even the overpressure does not work…
you have hundreads of posts here or other forums videos and claims from people about russians being op in this game that they have “favoritism” and you still say same BS “sample size” skill issue etc… but i don’t see hundreads of people saying that the russians are balanced you have only a few xD why is that?
I mean him specifically.
He’s always posting small sample sizes and short isolated clips to prove his point. I could do the exact same with a few clips of me tanking KH-38s in the Abrams and claim it’s immune to KH-38.
This also isn’t helped by the fact this guy doesn’t play Russian tanks and so doesn’t actually understand how much more weaknesses they have compared to let’s say, an abrams or leopard.
