You wouldn’t think that with how you act.
However you have pulled stuff out of your rear before, so no reason to believe those masters are real lol.
4 Likes
also if you notice, the screenshot he shared which has his account name in it, shows a different name from his account here and when you search for the sad acc on WT it shows up that means either he’s using another persons screenshot or has more than one account.-
Yes, the screenshot doesn’t come from me, it has been taken by someone else, duh.
How is that a bad argument that can’t be used in the russian bias debate ? lmao.
Now I have to take my own screenshots everytime in order for them to be receivable, according to @An_Pigeon . Wtf.
And you cannot read what , two ? short paragraphs which don’t even constitute half or even a fraction of an article?
I’d call BS on that.
2 masters lol. Can’t be related to anything numerical cause you certainly have no idea how statistics, data or maths work.
Can’t be related to literature either cause you cannot read.
I’ve dealt with my problems mate, all you’re here doing is derailing every single post you can touch from the relevant arguments to the point that even folks that usually butt heads are looking at you wondering wtf you’re talking about lol.
I mean you and I have had debates where I’ve actually written a lot. Close to article lengths when debating the likes of abrams or various jets at the same time.
I believe a paragraph is extremely short lol, as well as this, if he has two masters then the fact they will literally reject statistical data, logical points of contension as well as again literal data. Then I seriously worry for whatever education system gave said masters out.
all of this which detracts from any reasonable or coherent debates / talks which can be had about the actual issues at hand within the game right now.
EDIT : also looking back up, I’ve not even written much, at all lol there’s literally one sentence per response to quotations and then one actual written piece of text.
3 Likes
I did and my calculations came up with 66,6%, so again either you pulled the numbers out of your rear or you are seriously bad at math.
Neither of those options, or both combined, wouldn’t suprise me.
Oh big deal there is only 7 persons out of 10 queuing for Russia at top tier.
I assured 8 persons out of 10, I was really wrong on that one. /s
You can repeat yourself all you want, but that doesn’t change that I farm T-series on average.
Good for you man, but again it is not the case of the vast majority of top tier NATO players.
It absolutely is. All the points he made are the BS points that online US mains like to make and whine about, he just took those stupidly wrong points and made a joke video about them.
Go through the points he made in the video and those are things that US mains have whined about to the fricking letter. And those are also the points the US mains usually get clowned on for.
Like I said, your confirmation bias is through the roof. You think the video is not a joke because you want it to be not a joke.
Just ask him yourself in his next stream, and record his response, lol. It’s just your opinion, I’ve got mine.
Average NATO and Russian players are both bad. Russian top tier MBTs are easier for less skilled players to do well in and the less skilled players on the nato side, like yourself, can’t properly use the massive mobility and reload advantages that NATO vehicles have (or they can’t use them yet).
Sure man, everyone’s bad except you. You’re making up things now. Average NATO players are bad, all Russians players are bad. It’s your own fantaisy rn.
If russian MBTs are easier for less skilled players, just imagine how op they are for skilled players. You’re contradicting yourself.
The bias is real.
If you really wanna know, Applied Maths and Finance.
You asked so I replied, this way some people won’t be able to say I’m off-topic.
A video with questionable quotes said in a jokingly serious manner released on April fools? Must be a serious video /s
No? Just because it has a good round and aps doesn’t mean it’s OP. (Unless you think the XM-1 (GM) and 120S having top tier level characteristics are also undertiered.
Which is true in game. The arena is one of the slowest high tier MBTs in all metrics.
Some of its capabilities are, just like how other tanks have top tier firepower, mobility, or gun handling at lower BRs. Yet they are all still balanced because of their downsides.
China is a worse overall nation for top tier ground than the US. This is a fact.
China is continuously screwed over by Gaijin for both tanks and planes. Their top tier tanks have been missing spall liners since they were added, and they have the worst 14.7 plane (and a mediocre 14.3).
5 Likes
So sad you don’t actually trust me, don’t go there because you’re not ready about the following stuff that could be said lmao.
And you cannot read what , two ? short paragraphs
No no, I can read, I chose not to. My time is precious, not gonna waste it on you lol.
2 masters lol. Can’t be related to anything numerical
Lost lol. Try again
I’ve dealt with my problems mate, all you’re here doing is derailing every single post you can touch from the relevant arguments to the point that even folks that usually butt heads are looking at you wondering wtf you’re talking about lol.
All you’re here doing is coping, throwing witch hunts and ad hominems because you cannot argue anymore lmao.
You’re loosing your nerves mate.
1 Like
A video with questionable quotes said in a jokingly serious manner released on April fools? Must be a serious video /s
Again, ask him yourself in his next stream, and record his response.
No? Just because it has a good round and aps doesn’t mean it’s OP. (Unless you think the XM-1 (GM) and 120S having top tier level characteristics are also undertiered.
You just took as examples the XM and 120S as op vehicles lol. So yes, the arena is also op, as they are.
Which is true in game. The arena is one of the slowest high tier MBTs in all metrics.
But you just said the Arena doesn’t have good mobility, so couldn’t be considered as a top tier MBT at 11.0 ? And now you say it is true ingame ? So the lack of mobility is not a problem with russian MBTs ? So Arena being slow but powerful at 11.0, can indeed be considered a 12.7 MBT ?
You’re contradicting yourself lmao
Some of its capabilities are, just like how other tanks have top tier firepower, mobility, or gun handling at lower BRs. Yet they are all still balanced because of their downsides.
Ok so the Arena IS a top tier MBT ? The fact other vehicles in other nations are OP, does’t justify this one should be OP as well ?
So got it, the Arena is a top tier MBT at 11.0. Thank you.
China is a worse overall nation for top tier ground than the US. This is a fact.
lol
Their top tier tanks have been missing spall liners since they were added
Leclercs ? Arietes ? Abrams ?
Wtf, it’s not only China that suffers from this, it’s everyone except Russia
Oh ye sure mate I’m xenophobic will being myself an immigrant
The racism card has been pulled. Generally, it’s pulled when you cannot argue anymore lol.
You’re loosing your nerves, take some tea.
Yeah ok but 10k hours is roughly 1.14 years spent on the game, without sleeping/eating/going to the WC.
Kinda means you’re beginning to be good at the game.
Or its just 20,000 hours of someone repeating the same mistakes bro
4 Likes
Nope, Russian MBTs are incredibly limiting for skilled players. Ask the actually good players here and they’ll pick the Abrams over any T-series every time.
Also not contradicting at all. There are these 2 pretty widely known things: skill floor and skill ceiling.
The T-series have a low skill floor and a low skill ceiling while stuff like the Abrams/Leclerc/type 10/Merkava Mk.4 have a high skill floor and skill ceiling.
Which means that the T-series are easier to get into, but also worse for skilled players as the vehicles kind of bottleneck/handicap what said skilled players can do in them.
4 Likes
I too am an immigrant, whats the relevance?
You have consistently stated that china is better for reasons yet have not named anything
Even when people have told you time and time again it for top tier is incredibly mid.
Its vehicles for a nation you claim is biased are missing most their features. Their aeroplanes are quite limited as well as they always have been.
Also take some tea? Que estas diciendo.
1 Like
You mean the grind that is easily skippable with top tier premiums, which are conveniently one of the most played vehicles in the game ?
100-200 of games throughout the months is a single drop in the sea of like millions of games played at that time and is pretty much an insignificant data set.
Usual answer from someone that doesn’t have anything else to say.
I’m still waiting for you to explain why are Chinese tanks better than NATO ones while actually using some normal arguments.
So far you produced nothing of value and global stats tell us Chinese tanks are getting mogged by M1A2T, which is the same tank poor NATO mains use when suffering against eastern vehicles.
So yeah, your post reeks of some skill issues and biases.
4 Likes
Oh yeah, perception of what’s strong or not changes with skill level.
P-90 in CS offer much more in lower skilled lobbies than in higher skilled ones.
4 Likes
i’ve been reading a bit and SADRIPer seems like a ragebaiter not worth communicating with
4 Likes
This may sounds funny but I think Abrams and Oplot are the best top tier mbt for the chinese tech tree lol
5 Likes
i love how F-15C GE is the same BR as J-10C
1 Like