It was released on April first, and included a quote such as “[American spaa aren’t good, and they are giving us bad ones] instead of what we should have, the Patriot missile system.”
First, it’s true. Second, just ask him yourself lol. It is not april fools.
The XM-1 has top tier mobility at 9.3
The 120S has a top tier turret at 10.3
Ok so Arena IS a russian bias at top tier then ? Interesting.
Sure the Arena has near top tier firepower, but it sucks in every other way, especially mobility.
Plot twist : in a BALANCED game, Russia is NOT supposed to have the same mobility as NATO MBTs, duh. They already have firepower and armor.
So no, it doesn’t need good mobility to be considered top tier compatible. It is just a 11.0 MBT with top tier capabilities, and that’s it.
Are you trying to say that China of all nations has bias towards it?
No, I’m trying to say Russia struggles against China only.
Because Russia+China+eastern vehicles in general have the bias in this game.
there is no biass in game huh? gaijin ad helis with dircm and 14 km range ir missiles this helis is immune to new spaas what gaijin do? ad for ruussia other spaa with saclos mode to shot down this helis but other nations again suffer no problem… selective “balanc”
and reload, with a 600 pen round at 10.3 it’s only drawback is the mobility which can be worked around.
hmm lets see
mobility
reload
survivability
gun depression
shall I continue? the arena is not it mate.
All players of only the big 3 are usually terrible it’s the curse of playing nations which are more handheld.
The majority moves around when 2A7 dropped most the player base was in germany, for a long ass time.
same as wehn the 2A7H dropped lol, then when it came to the rafale well france saw a huge rise in numbers too.
You trust millions of players conviently now but when it comes to statistically showing you russian winrates aren’t that good, nor are their tanks / vehicles bar very select few.
Then it’s sufficient to go nah the stats are rigged? make your mind up.
again then why are there no games with russia V russia aka russia fighting russia the fact is 80 percent of the Player base is in fact not playing russia, that’s a timer graph for the exact moment it does not in fact represent the entire player base of warthunder.
Cause I can tell you for a fact when I queue as italy at top teir for a match there are more than 2 people in teh damn queue xD
or germany for example for me it shows 10 - 17 , USA 20 odds, RU about the same as that little over, britain, japan and china it shows up at 5 or 6 odds sometimes higher.
he quite literally posted videos about fake leak lists he has consistently over the past 4 or 5 updates conviently shifted to pointing to russian bias, distinctly remember his fit about the reload buff to the T series being one of said videos.
Ryanberry is a nugget man xD most CCs are they spout nonsense to get engagements.
He has 10k hours, alright cool I’ve just under half that and would disagree with him.
There’s literally pages of evidence which disagree with it as well xD
oddbawz has literally for years been against russian bias and as most of us here has complained about poor game mechanic implementations like volumetric best example is when he took out the sargeant york and was blasting T series tanks through the roof and lauhging his ass off saying it was due to the volumetric which made it a super tank killed.
Ah yes the mighty justin plays who consistently ODLs in his games , which I’ve played with him once and against him twice and he’s been bottom of the board in 2 of those games.
I’ve also played with tankenstein who was laughing his butt of at me using a khalid at top tier.
Which is funny as the ajax is literally one of the best 10.3 IFVs in the game, one of the few armoured enough to go toe to toe with most autocannon lights and come out on top.
He hesitated to admit it cause he knows that if he says “russian bias” then he cannot objectively complain about any other nation which also gets favourable vehicles placed in the tree lol.
You stated and I quote
“Bottom line, Russia has just the best SPAAs compared to NATO ?”
Which they don’t as it’s completely situational, the BUK is terrible compared to the likes of the IRIS- T claws, etc etc.
The ITO used to be not far behind the pantsir BTW in KD.
The new pantsir wasn’t necessary at all to be added but it’s not some hyper OP match ender like you’re harping on about.
You mean how at 12.7 US has comparable WRs to RU and Germany is lagging behind because 2A7V and SLM are the two only things it has to offer ?
No, I mean how Germany + the US underperform at 10.7.
How is that irrelevant if I’m literally proving to you that average WT player is far from being good at the game ?
You’re taking the overall kd, which is the low and mid tiers players and the top tiers players.
Low and mid tiers players will most likely never play top tier because of the grind. Low/mid tiers and top tiers players are 2 different playerbases. Top tier players are most likely more competent.
It also takes in consideration the bad winrates because of the russian bias throughout the BRs, the bad winrates of the players who just want to play the lore (with bad vehicles, definitely not the META at least)/helirushers (massive deaths for them every game)/players who don’t sweat and just want to have fun
I don’t know where you’re going with this. You’re so fed up with that global stats argument, that you’re kinda becoming crazy because of it rn ngl.
Meanwhile you’re trusting your 100-200 games over hundreds of thousands played by millions of said players.
What’s the like between the 2 arguments lmao ?
Your opinion is your opinion only (= 1 solely opinion), my games are hundreds of them, at least. My games represent stats more than your solo opinion lol.
Having a hate boner towards top tier China just tells me you have very limited understanding of the game.
You are either a top tier ragebaiter here to just agitate people ,or genuinely cannot read.
IF you believe what I have written is a lot then you seriously and I mean seriously need to go out and educate yourself, what I’ve written is very, very little.
It just shows that when it comes to someone who can actually debate your points with facts you choose to say
Im not going to read that “it’s too much”
when the truth is it’s because you literally cannot argue the points.
We’re still waiting for the AH-64 capability to multi target and launch all its FnF missiles at the same time. We’re still waiting for the bushmaster to get its burst fire mode. We’re still waiting for better NATO DARTS and 140mm cannons capable of pening russian UFPs.
And so much more. But it won’t happen, because the balance has to go only 1 way (advantaging Russia).
Dude he quite literally doesn’t read what you say.
When you get to the point when he cannot argue the point he’ll just say “not going to read that”.
also if you notice, the screenshot he shared which has his account name in it, shows a different name from his account here and when you search for the sad acc on WT it shows up that means either he’s using another persons screenshot or has more than one account.-
I did and my calculations came up with 66,6%, so again either you pulled the numbers out of your rear or you are seriously bad at math.
Neither of those options, or both combined, wouldn’t suprise me.
You can repeat yourself all you want, but that doesn’t change that I farm T-series on average.
It absolutely is. All the points he made are the BS points that online US mains like to make and whine about, he just took those stupidly wrong points and made a joke video about them.
Go through the points he made in the video and those are things that US mains have whined about to the fricking letter. And those are also the points the US mains usually get clowned on for.
Like I said, your confirmation bias is through the roof. You think the video is not a joke because you want it to be not a joke.
Average NATO and Russian players are both bad. Russian top tier MBTs are easier for less skilled players to do well in and the less skilled players on the nato side, like yourself, can’t properly use the massive mobility and reload advantages that NATO vehicles have (or they can’t use them yet).
also if you notice, the screenshot he shared which has his account name in it, shows a different name from his account here and when you search for the sad acc on WT it shows up that means either he’s using another persons screenshot or has more than one account.-
Yes, the screenshot doesn’t come from me, it has been taken by someone else, duh.
How is that a bad argument that can’t be used in the russian bias debate ? lmao.
Now I have to take my own screenshots everytime in order for them to be receivable, according to @An_Pigeon . Wtf.
And you cannot read what , two ? short paragraphs which don’t even constitute half or even a fraction of an article?
I’d call BS on that.
2 masters lol. Can’t be related to anything numerical cause you certainly have no idea how statistics, data or maths work.
Can’t be related to literature either cause you cannot read.
I’ve dealt with my problems mate, all you’re here doing is derailing every single post you can touch from the relevant arguments to the point that even folks that usually butt heads are looking at you wondering wtf you’re talking about lol.
I mean you and I have had debates where I’ve actually written a lot. Close to article lengths when debating the likes of abrams or various jets at the same time.
I believe a paragraph is extremely short lol, as well as this, if he has two masters then the fact they will literally reject statistical data, logical points of contension as well as again literal data. Then I seriously worry for whatever education system gave said masters out.
all of this which detracts from any reasonable or coherent debates / talks which can be had about the actual issues at hand within the game right now.
EDIT : also looking back up, I’ve not even written much, at all lol there’s literally one sentence per response to quotations and then one actual written piece of text.
I did and my calculations came up with 66,6%, so again either you pulled the numbers out of your rear or you are seriously bad at math.
Neither of those options, or both combined, wouldn’t suprise me.
Oh big deal there is only 7 persons out of 10 queuing for Russia at top tier.
I assured 8 persons out of 10, I was really wrong on that one. /s
You can repeat yourself all you want, but that doesn’t change that I farm T-series on average.
Good for you man, but again it is not the case of the vast majority of top tier NATO players.
It absolutely is. All the points he made are the BS points that online US mains like to make and whine about, he just took those stupidly wrong points and made a joke video about them.
Go through the points he made in the video and those are things that US mains have whined about to the fricking letter. And those are also the points the US mains usually get clowned on for.
Like I said, your confirmation bias is through the roof. You think the video is not a joke because you want it to be not a joke.
Just ask him yourself in his next stream, and record his response, lol. It’s just your opinion, I’ve got mine.
Average NATO and Russian players are both bad. Russian top tier MBTs are easier for less skilled players to do well in and the less skilled players on the nato side, like yourself, can’t properly use the massive mobility and reload advantages that NATO vehicles have (or they can’t use them yet).
Sure man, everyone’s bad except you. You’re making up things now. Average NATO players are bad, all Russians players are bad. It’s your own fantaisy rn.
If russian MBTs are easier for less skilled players, just imagine how op they are for skilled players. You’re contradicting yourself.