“Twin engine” has been part of the discussion from the beginning.
3 Likes
Apart from the Me-262, all other APHE capable tank busters are on larger twin engine aircraft.
All single engine fighter planes with that capability only have solid AP or HVAP.
The Yak has the best of both.
1 Like
Agreed.
1 Like
I don’t think you understand how potent the Me410 is.
It’s quite literally more powerful than all the Yaks in the game because of its HVAP munition.
I haven’t bothered getting it because HVAP is not very good. The one shot capability of APHE combined with the Yaks good flight performance make it undertiered.
4 Likes
HVAP has always been meta.
Yaks are not under-BR’d, and their flight performance with the 45mm gun is equivalent to other gun CAS while having worse anti-aircraft capability.
1 Like
I think you’re wasting your effort and breath. You’ve went into detail and showed quite clearly that the Russian APHE shells are pretty insane, especially on fighter planes that are themselves already very good in WT. And don’t really have an equivalent.
His response was basically accusing you of dishonesty/moving the goal post and going “No u”.
1 Like
This stats were supposed to show something?
And that talk about Yaks being bad as anti air? Amusing
1 Like
Because it’s the only thing that appeared on planes with good performance until the Yak got APHE.
That is just a lie. It’s gun is way better than anything with comparable flight performance at it’s BR.
2 Likes
Tu-1 with APHE is pretty epic, literally onetapping any sherman tank easily. Turret roof and poof its gone.
1 Like
Got somehow got to offset T-80 becoming the next sherman
Oh yeah. It’s DEFINITELY just the Yak with APHE
You trade the 20mm anti-air gun for a 37 or 45 anti-tank gun, leaving you with 2x 50 cals.
It’s effectively a Dauntless as anti-air.
@Ion_Protogen
The ability to retain energy only matters for air to air, not air to ground.
Air to ground more relies on the ability to get nose on target.
I’ve been running yak-equivalent CAS since 2018.
Yak is not unique and will never be unique unless its equivalents are flat out removed from the game, not delisted, outright removed.
1 Like
I see.
Let us forget about Yak-9UT!
12.7mm is preatty capable ;)
1 Like
.50 Cals are okay, but rely on quantity of guns. 4 is good, 6 is ideal.
So again, nothing wrong with its capability to do anti air work ;)
1 Like
Me looking at the TIS MA I got in the snowglobes and seeing this post laughing myself to death.
1 Like
Soviet .50s pack a much harder punch than US .50s, having both a much higher fire chance and also being mounted in the nose, meaning no need to worry about convergence.
Feel free to try and experiment. Which hits harder, a P-38 without the 20mm or an F8F-1?
Absolutely not true, energy retention is critical for ground strike. Doing the vertical loops required for repeated CAS runs (especially as needed for gun CAS) is intensely wasteful on energy. Better energy retention means you’re more easily able to continue to do runs, rather than having to reset. Having more speed also makes it harder for you to be intercepted by CAS or SPAA.
Don’t believe me? Try running an IL-2 for CAS. You have to take exceptionally long runs to preserve your energy, and if you don’t (or even think about making a vertical loop), you’re completely out of energy and forced to make slow, low angle runs that make you a sitting duck for CAP, SPAA, or even aware tank players. Same principle holds true for almost all other gun CAS, barring the 50mm 262. Meanwhile, the Yak-9K can just keep doing vertical loops over and over again with little energy lost.
10 Likes
If you use the Pzgr.40 HVAP on the Bk 5 instead of Pzgr.39, then i cant give your opinion any worth.
1 Like