+1
With Xian H-6K, Avro vulcan and Tu-160
7 Likes
The plane would be perfectly playable in sim, just like many planes that are no longer playable in realistic or arcade but can stand out in other mods
2 Likes
I was debating making a suggestion for this, actually
it would be viable in all game modes also it has flares that weigh 3 pounds each
1 Like
and are -just- simple up-grades done over time
Under no circumstances is a B-1 surviving in arcade mode and past the merge in rb
That’s the thing you don’t merge you just gun it, also arcades dead at top tier air, so its mostly bots (ex: I’ve survived as an f-111 in RB and was the last one left despite me not even carrying a gun)
2 Likes
Bomber gameplay would be running away simulator, not what would actually be fun
The way to make it fun would be to have reforms for strategic bombers
you know the b-1 is a low altitude supersonic bomber right? that means you use it more like this: (xbox app on chrombook is slow so give me a few)
ABSOLUTLEY but it should spawn from like 30km distance to the battlefield cuz pantsir can spawn kill it lol
shouldn’t we get the b52 before? pretty sure the b1 was supposed to replace the b52
no, it was built to fill a different role (but it could still perform the same role as the b-52)
but isnt the b1 a straight upgrade to b52 besides cost
no, the b-1a project was meant to replace them but it was canceled and they ended up using b-1b to supplement the bomber force.
“The B-1A was initially developed in the 1970s as a replacement for the B-52. Four prototypes of this long-range, high speed (Mach 2.2) strategic bomber were developed and tested in the mid-1970s, but the program was canceled in 1977 before going into production. Flight testing continued through 1981.” - https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104500/b-1b-lancer/
well even mach 1.2 of the b1b is faster than the b52 also pretty sure the b1 wins in low radar signature
yea it does it was meant to act in a more precision role but if they add a b-52 they should add the old dog
https://www.google.com/search?gs_ssp=eJzj4tLP1TcwMi-3zKk0YPQSTcvJTM8oUchPUyjJSFXIz0lRSMlPBwC9xAsr&q=flight+of+the+old+dog&rlz=1CAJFMC_enUS1095&oq=flight+of+the+old&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgBEC4YgAQyCggAEAAY4wIYgAQyBwgBEC4YgAQyBggCEEUYOTIHCAMQLhiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIKCAkQABiABBiiBNIBCDQ4NzZqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
great book btw
1 Like
nope, the B1 was an hypersonic longrange bomber. the B52 is only a long range bomber
WTF, after Tu95 people are back to wanting strategic bombers? They are supposed to carry long range strikes, and their weapon selection (modern) are mostly long range, which surpasses the entire map length already. I could get there is a point in adding bigger bombers as AIs but to use them, really?
1 Like
shouldn’t that make the B1 better why having a subsonic longrange bomber when you can have a supersonic one. with the same payload and less engines
1 Like
War Thunder ≠ Real Life
In real life if an interceptor is within 20km of your bomber at all times something went very wrong
Running away simulator isn’t fun, go play the missileless Vautours if you think it is
1 Like