*that have naval
I would love to play naval if they add it to my main but gaijin refuse to do so
1 Like
Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure gajin said this year that we shouldn’t expect Sweden, China or Israeli naval trees.
It would be cool to see Israel in naval, but it probably needs to be limited to coastal unless a subtree is added with a significant naval force
This is originally and real exist Sovetsky Souz.
But in gajin game non-exist will be better in all than exist.
1 Like
Israel can have blue water as well
Sure they dont have battleships but there is cool destroyers and stuff
And when missiles gonna be added israel gonna have alot to offer
1 Like
When it gets to the missile point, I have no doubt, the issue is Israel only has 3 gun destroyers (1 batch 1 hunt and 2 Z class).
I was thinking that the destroyers would be at the top of the coastal tree.
1 Like
5, except usa, uk, ussr and italia
relax . . . it’s a joke . . ☻
2 Likes
And unironically brings nothing to naval that it actually needs. Bringing another top tier while the entire gamemode is still broken as is for years from the lack of decompression and permament enduring confontration.
5 Likes
Thats only what was suggested im sure there is more and also u have diffrent variant so u can make some of them folded or smt
And i will take a small tt its better then nothing
1 Like
dont worry, they might be huge and with insane armor but with gaijin’s way of bigger caliber = less accurate it will be like most of them shooting shotguns into the air hoping of all the pebblets one is landing somewhere on the enemy ship. and then it still needs to hit something critical. :-) i mean with the insane spread of some salvos of the mutsus and amagis 41 cm guns imagine hitting anything with the yamatos 46 cm shells if they keep with that link of accuracy to caliber
But yeah i hope this wont turn top tier naval which feels ok atm into unbalanced slugfest on maps which are too small already
1 Like
Beauty
Some missiles☝️🤓😭.
I like missile (altough, this is war thunder so it would probably make it worse)
I mean we have some missile armed ships (Uss Douglas, Bravy, La combanttante and Bernau)
Main reason we don’t have more asms is that naval already has a range problem.
1 Like
Sweden could be done, but it would cap out around 6.0. China could be done but would cap out around 5.0. If you include all nordic nations with sweden it would have depth and variety for sure. China would have a colossal coastal tree and very thin blue water. Still it would have depth and variety in the ships avaialable. Israel could have a coastal tree only and probably wouldn’t be worth the time.
2 Likes
This
2 Likes
Would love to see a minor tree. Hungary and Romania are already in Italy… so add Naval. Austro-Hungarian navy and Romania has a few unique ships.
3 Likes
Tbh I’d always thought that Romania should’ve been given the main subtree, Spain the lesser subtree and then Hungary would be part of a V4 tree.
It’s worse that gajin seems dead set on doing nothing interesting with either subtree aswell baring the 2 domestic Romanian planes and the ww2 Hungarian tanks. They then go ahead and leave Spain completely dry, splitting it between Germany and Italy (Similar to how Canada was treated).
1 Like
Not how I would have handled it either. Still, there’s plenty of room for improvement without using any copy paste. STILL waiting for the Nimrod. and Romania has lots of really cool BMP and T-55 variants that would be totally unique. Not to mention a few IAR planes from ww2 and beyond.
2 Likes
Israel has destroyers and some gunships too
Sure not many but it can be cool
Also as i said the moment gaijin will start to implement missiles israel has alot to offer
And since we are getting into ww2 battleships we can defenitly can start seeing some missiles carriers in the near future
Sure, but I think that all fits in a coastal tree.