Responding to issues regarding dev server reports 13.12.2023

Ok and your point is we need a tree to grind so we can suffer
This is sounding very petty

Where is the Merkava? It was supposed to receive realistic turret armor in Sons of Attila. Now that it’s delayed it’s also not featured in the realistic spall liner list?

4 Likes

every vehicle in this game is to ‘lengthen the grind’.

1 Like

yes the maker should get the better version

To what

we suffer, why cant you??

Didn’t get this call either. If they’re are identical, there’s no reason why Gaijin couldn’t have given the Sweds the C variant. Or both honestly. Probably both.

1 Like

Please remember it potentially was out of ammunition on presentation , dont forget to remove the possibility to shoot then.

exactly

Looks like it shoots just fine: https://youtu.be/0nnshXNkZ9A?si=BjyE9NjTdznMwibS&t=24

4 Likes

very likely yeah…and wait till they finally come up with some excuse to not implement the DU inserts. " Oh no the Abrams doesn’t NEED it, it’s OP! "

1 Like

this is just absurd as the main selling point of the T-90M is the spal lining , more ever the Leos , the Strvs, are the hardest tanks to kill ingame u have to carefully aim at them to kill , even side shots get’s absorbed by the fuel tanks and the hidden armor in them , yet when bringing the T-90M and putting them in the same weight class as the leos and the Strvs players keep on wanting their vehicles to still be OP and overpreforming and yet they want more and the USSR tech tree only get few decet top tire tanks this is just unacceptable from the devs to do so , the T-90M has the biggest weak spot from all tanks ingame it’s the desigen of the hull aka the Driver hatch spot is still the weakest and it gives an opening for all players to not aim and just shot at the driver hatch gun spot and breach of which gives them confirmed kill everytime they face a Russian tank i thought the T-90M would have a simillar protaction like the US , Ger , Sweeds but no it seems gaijin doesn’t care about it’s main players of which is the USSR players

Hey are you guys going to fix the absurd muzzle flash of the 40mm Bofors yet!? couldn’t see it on the dev server!

Guys seriously this is a problem! The muzzle flash should be hidden due to the muzzle flash HIDER!

Report: Community Bug Reporting System

1 Like

Have you seen our ground
Much worse then your at top tier

Do you plan to do something with 6 27Ers? Earlier number of missles was redused (e.g. 141 with 2) due balance reasons but what happends now? Other nations have the same missles as before but 1 plane will get 6 best missles by FAR in the game. Balance?

Earlier 29 or 141 beat 16 or m2k in BVR and 16 or 2k beat 29 or 141 on ECM, that looked at some sort balanced.

Now we have Su27 that beat all other planes in BVR and pretty much in ECM too. Balance? Balance hey where are you?

As a active tournament player I do not want to have 1 far best plane in the game, It’s very boring and dumb. You can not create another powercreep with straight face.

You should AT LEAST add proper missile counterparts like new AIM 7 variant or early variants of 120 for non Soviet countries. In any case they will be worse than current implementation of 27Er due less range

2 Likes

you forgot that the gripen A gets 7 hardpoints but the C gets 8

and


image

by numbers, no
by quality, yes
but where not talking ground, where talking air, in which case
you have more toptier air, you have more air in general, you have more multirole planes
we have 2 planes that are exactly the same but 1 has all aspect missiles

I’ve seen the arguement that the challenger 3 prototype shouldn’t get spall liners in the turret because the prototype doesn’t have them, yet they put in all the systems the Yak 141 didn’t even have installed. This is a double standard for prototypes.

Like what the FGR2 with skyflashs and aim9gs or the same thing but naval

They changed the name to Tech demonstrator