What about the Aubl 74 HVG?
@Stona_WT
It’s not a good vehicle… its reload is too slow. Therefore it should get a reload buff, given how small the round is. (60mm)
Vehicle:F5E
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.3->11.0
AGM65 was overvalued over and over again, even though it is AGM65 B. How could jets without any laser-guided pods be at 11.3? And AGM65B could only lock targets in 6km, which means it will be easily shot down by any SPAA over 10.3, especially like 2s6 or HQ17, even some IR missiles
1 Like
Vehicle: R2Y2
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.0-7.7
This is my last time to mention R2Y2 before it is deleted from TT., I still have no idea why it could be 8.0, even we have using F80C to solo R2Y2 to prove it was worse than F80C, consider in GRB japan only has F84G and kikka, both of them are pretty bad in GRB air combat, Japan now really needs a high mobility jets to against other nations powerful jets, also from 7.3-8.0, there is almost no more good SPAA for Japan, so the only hope is move R2Y2 to 7.7 in GRB
2 Likes
No they blimmen well do not.
Reload is the ONLY thing going for the Type 90s. They have the worst rounds at 11.3 by a decent margin, the worst armour, gen 1 thermals and barely better mobility than anything else. Even the reload isnt as good as it used to be with the Leclercs and Abrams getting 5 sec reloads these days.
The TKX(P) loses out on some of some of the mobility of the Type 90s in return for Gen3 thermals, with the same round and just as pathetic armour.
Type 81C which, yet again, DOESNT EVEN HAVE A SEARCH RADAR, and, yet again, cannot lock onto helis.
Am also a Japan main at top tier. My recommendation is to try and get the Thai F-5s. The squadron FCU or the tech tree one. They get 4x Mavs and are strong fighters for dodging both ground missiles and other planes. (The tech tree one is technically better in GRB specifically because it can take better AAMs with its mavs, while the squadren one is better in ARB because 4x AAMs)
Ive been using them in GRB to decent effect
5 Likes
I don’t understand why the F-15A has such a high combat rating? This plane has very weak air-to-air weapons and only 2 bombs. It belongs at 11.0.
I didn’t realise the F15A was weaker than the Tornado F3
The tornado seems to carry more bombs. And there are air-to-air missiles.
Okay, 3.0 then. Deal?
Tornado F3 has no bombs and the F3 has 4x 9Ls and 4x Skyflash. The F15A has 4x 9M and 4x Aim-7M and as is faster, turns better and has more CMs.
I haven’t used Vorob’i for a long time, they are absolutely useless missiles on any BR. The only ones left are AIM-9M which are not as overpowered as before.
I still don’t see why the F15A should be below 12.0. it’s the right BR for it given it’s loadout and FM.
Nah. Needs a better shell now. It already struggled against many 5.0 / 4.7 tanks. Now it will be free food, and allllll that armor which was its big pro, will now become worthless.
This BR has a Harrier with 4 G Mavericks and an AIM-120A. The F-15A looks just stupid on this BR, it has nothing.
Again, and?
your not meant to use it for CAS, use it for CAP. You want it to be nearly the same BR has the phantoms with 9Gs and Skyflash
Ah yes, 11.0. thats a super fair battle rating for an F15, its only competing with early phantoms, and Mig21s. That seems perfectly fair for an F-15.
As much as Gaijins BR changes sometimes confuse me, comments like this are kind of proving Gaijins stance for not giving players more of a say.
6 Likes
only if KV-1(L-11) gets lower br
No. Kv1e is clearly worser.
Ok at this point I’m certain you’re just trolling now.
Is KV-1S not going to be 3rd rank?
That would make it the only 4.3 at 2nd rank in the whole ground, air and coastal
Hmmm, does that make it Bluewater ship?
Why Super Etendard? At least give it thermal pods if you’re gonna move it up, what was it doing so wrong at 10.7? It just got uptiered last time too to 10.7
3 Likes