Responding to Feedback on the Planned Battle Rating Changes April 2025

what exactly? i dont see any other cas around at 4.7 or below can dogfight almost anything and can easily kill 7+ tanks in a very short time.
there is a reason why you see the 9k regularly still even at 8.3 matches. its op as all hell.

1 Like

yeah, M26 is now completely useless :)

2 Likes

Thx gaijoon. I hate it.

Once more all sorts of Russian nerfs

Meanwhile:

turm III, Tiger H1s, OST, West, M4a3E2s… the bully USA 6.3-7.3 heavies all remain intact

What a joke

1 Like

Like the M60A2 and the M551 needed to be 8.0… WHAT A BRILLIANT IDEA, MORE VIETNAM TANKS IN WW2 BRS, just like 60% of the USA tree

Again, if you aren’t going to share this data with us; just saying they have “high efficiency” means nothing. Now you are effectively leaving the French M26 alone with no line up now.

2 Likes

All of these are balanced at tier current BR, and you could argue that the Jumbos are overtiered. However, the Turm III is definitely undertiered, and deserves 8.7 atleast.

Vehicles that deserved it got nerfed.

They don’t even need to share the full data because that could lead to abuse. They just need to give objective comparisons to other vehicles based purely on the performance and capability of similar vehicles.

I want someone from Gaijin to come out and say why the Q-5s are going up despite them being a Mig-19 sidegrade with flares, or why the AMX-13s are going to 7.0 despite them not easily being able to pen a Tiger II H headon. It’s just ridicuous.

The fact that comments on ASB mode do not get the same number of likes as comments on RB modes does not mean that SB mode should be ignored. It’s just that fewer people are playing it, but it’s still being played.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

The hell they are.

Next they’ll nerf my T-34-85…

But if vehicles that deserved it got moved, why not the T29? T34? T26e5???

Gepard? Itpsv? Za-35?

What about the Aubl 74 HVG?
@Stona_WT

It’s not a good vehicle… its reload is too slow. Therefore it should get a reload buff, given how small the round is. (60mm)

Vehicle:F5E
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.3->11.0

AGM65 was overvalued over and over again, even though it is AGM65 B. How could jets without any laser-guided pods be at 11.3? And AGM65B could only lock targets in 6km, which means it will be easily shot down by any SPAA over 10.3, especially like 2s6 or HQ17, even some IR missiles

1 Like

Vehicle: R2Y2
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.0-7.7

This is my last time to mention R2Y2 before it is deleted from TT., I still have no idea why it could be 8.0, even we have using F80C to solo R2Y2 to prove it was worse than F80C, consider in GRB japan only has F84G and kikka, both of them are pretty bad in GRB air combat, Japan now really needs a high mobility jets to against other nations powerful jets, also from 7.3-8.0, there is almost no more good SPAA for Japan, so the only hope is move R2Y2 to 7.7 in GRB

2 Likes

No they blimmen well do not.

Reload is the ONLY thing going for the Type 90s. They have the worst rounds at 11.3 by a decent margin, the worst armour, gen 1 thermals and barely better mobility than anything else. Even the reload isnt as good as it used to be with the Leclercs and Abrams getting 5 sec reloads these days.

The TKX(P) loses out on some of some of the mobility of the Type 90s in return for Gen3 thermals, with the same round and just as pathetic armour.

Type 81C which, yet again, DOESNT EVEN HAVE A SEARCH RADAR, and, yet again, cannot lock onto helis.

Am also a Japan main at top tier. My recommendation is to try and get the Thai F-5s. The squadron FCU or the tech tree one. They get 4x Mavs and are strong fighters for dodging both ground missiles and other planes. (The tech tree one is technically better in GRB specifically because it can take better AAMs with its mavs, while the squadren one is better in ARB because 4x AAMs)

Ive been using them in GRB to decent effect

4 Likes

image
I don’t understand why the F-15A has such a high combat rating? This plane has very weak air-to-air weapons and only 2 bombs. It belongs at 11.0.

I didn’t realise the F15A was weaker than the Tornado F3

The tornado seems to carry more bombs. And there are air-to-air missiles.

Okay, 3.0 then. Deal?

Tornado F3 has no bombs and the F3 has 4x 9Ls and 4x Skyflash. The F15A has 4x 9M and 4x Aim-7M and as is faster, turns better and has more CMs.

I haven’t used Vorob’i for a long time, they are absolutely useless missiles on any BR. The only ones left are AIM-9M which are not as overpowered as before.