f104 S and tas are at 11.3 where the f4e is at with 2 more missiles and the ability to carry 4 better sarh missiles along with its cannon, so yeah the s and tas should be 11.0 but they’re not my main concern. I grinded italy to play the f104 asa specifically as it looked quite fun just to have them move everything up to 12.0 from 11.3 for “decompression” and see the f104 asa get moved to 12.0 which just negated any concept of decompression when it was one of the hardest hit with compression…
Having an unusable rwr at those brs is a death sentence as you face 7fs every game which have no smoke trail by the time they hit you. Plus the lack of missiles makes it extraordinarily hard to get kills as 4 9ls is no longer as good as they used to be. Even the premium harrier 2s at 11.3 get 4 9ls and with a FAR FAR better fm.
I mean you are on imaging rn, but clouds shouldn’t effect it that much. Its the same with the stormer where youll be unable to lock a guy further out than 3km due to a cloud despite the fact its an f16 or mig 29 with the heat sig of a small sun.
that’s what i mean the electro optical tracking only works on the right conditions something that its almost impossible when there is clouds in almost every single game, its so situational that statistics dosent matter when the guys using the type 81 are the same guys that keep making japan one of the countries in wt with highest winrates
It’s weird that M4A2 is getting ignored while its equal is moving to 4.3. XD
Oh well, OP Sherman again.
There are equal and better CAS to Yak 9K in the 3.0 - 4.7 range.
@MokaMoki trying to get Gaijin to disclose stats to intentionally lower stats of vehicles in-game to lower their BRs.
The balancing system requires anonymous stats.
I disagree. If you are using it in your argument to adjust something, you need to disclose it. You are quite literally asking players to just blindly trust you on a decision that is impacting them. Anonymity doesn’t fly here. I can understand not disclosing cheat and exploit detection, thats fine. But not here. Leaning way too hard into the “trust me bro” aspect.
They are not asking for blind trust because we KNOW their methods require the stats to be gathered naturally, without parties knowing the specific metrics being gathered.
It’s similar to how anti-cheat devs will never tell alleged cheaters how they were banned, cause disclosing that information makes it easier to manipulate gameplay.
@pooqich
The issue with the Q-5 variants is even in uptiers, they’re extremely survivable doing their strike runs, as very few things can climb as well as a Q-5.
Maybe because we will spend a fortune on Tonka (Saudi) if it comes out, even if Gaijin keeps neglecting ARB/ASB.
Gaijin’s interest in Air will be slowly fade away just like naval did I guess.
It’s just that an 11.7 plane launches X38 at 11km and it destroys half the respawn with a splash. And you’re on “one of the most effective SAMs” just looking at it.
No one said space climbing, if you haven’t learned energy management by now I’d recommend videos by Defyn or others that teach energy management.
Using Q-5’s superior potential energy you out-escape enemies long enough for them to get engaged by a team mate, and Q-5’s strength comes from baiting enemies into targeting you while the superior fighters deal with them due to Q-5’s superior climb rate.
The climb is the strongest tool for weakness of all aircraft that lack high TWR.
Then the Q-5 goes back to getting thunderer as they do every single match.
In Gaijin’s theory
Every 4-engine prop bomber needs to be higher than 7.0 as long as they are extremely survivable in their strike runs
if they spaceclimb with sideclimbing and camp in high ground, unless the enemy brings jets. :P
