Responding to Feedback on the Planned Battle Rating Changes April 2025

The only thing that i dont understand, its most of 14.0 going to 13.0 in GRB but the F-15E still 12.7, USA needs to stop having a lot of click-bait users and this is the best way at least for now, just look at the U.S win-rate.

still nothing for the chinese M60A3 TTS having no reason to be at 9.0

1 Like

Still kept J-7D on 10.7
while keeping the Killing Q-5A/L to 10.0, which can possibly lead to further A-5C nerf into 11.0.

Gaijin, Why you hates strike aircraft so freakin much?

As a Joke, I can’t wait to see F-16ADF down to 12.3 because it can’t bomb with napalm while Tornado GR.1 goes 12.0 because it can bomb.

While US gets another subsidy in their P-47D-28 down to 4.7 because of playing badly and licking the ground, but both of P-47D-30 outside US remain at 5.0

Splendid work Gaijin. Splendid.
Please keep killing the game step by step.

3 Likes

Gaijin just can’t admit the existence of bomber and strike aircraft in this ‘glorious fighter heaven TDM’

We can also see that Vautour(bomber) is still stuck at 9.0 in ARB :/

The only role that Gaijin let us to do is ‘being a manned bot which gives an extra reward than unmanned bot’

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT Any idea how to get the F-104 ASA moved down a br or two? I cant see any reason why it should be at 12.0 when i doubt there are enough players playing it to get accurate stats for it. So would making a report be the best idea or just playing it enough to where you see it isnt functioning as well as it should be. Even 11.7 would stop it facing ARH missiles.

1 Like

The F-104 ASA should be 11.3, and there isn’t any reason for it not to be, especially when compared to the J-8B.

To adjust for that, move the other F-104s down in BR too.

2 Likes

f104 S and tas are at 11.3 where the f4e is at with 2 more missiles and the ability to carry 4 better sarh missiles along with its cannon, so yeah the s and tas should be 11.0 but they’re not my main concern. I grinded italy to play the f104 asa specifically as it looked quite fun just to have them move everything up to 12.0 from 11.3 for “decompression” and see the f104 asa get moved to 12.0 which just negated any concept of decompression when it was one of the hardest hit with compression…

Having an unusable rwr at those brs is a death sentence as you face 7fs every game which have no smoke trail by the time they hit you. Plus the lack of missiles makes it extraordinarily hard to get kills as 4 9ls is no longer as good as they used to be. Even the premium harrier 2s at 11.3 get 4 9ls and with a FAR FAR better fm.

the allmighty type 81 when there is a cloud

8 Likes

If you aren’t willing to share those statistics with us, then it means nothing to say this. “Trust me bro” is an asinine balancing lever.

5 Likes

I mean you are on imaging rn, but clouds shouldn’t effect it that much. Its the same with the stormer where youll be unable to lock a guy further out than 3km due to a cloud despite the fact its an f16 or mig 29 with the heat sig of a small sun.

that’s what i mean the electro optical tracking only works on the right conditions something that its almost impossible when there is clouds in almost every single game, its so situational that statistics dosent matter when the guys using the type 81 are the same guys that keep making japan one of the countries in wt with highest winrates

4 Likes

What about Sim??

It’s weird that M4A2 is getting ignored while its equal is moving to 4.3. XD
Oh well, OP Sherman again.

There are equal and better CAS to Yak 9K in the 3.0 - 4.7 range.

@MokaMoki trying to get Gaijin to disclose stats to intentionally lower stats of vehicles in-game to lower their BRs.
The balancing system requires anonymous stats.

Looking at those changes. They only looked at GRB. Barely any aircraft in RB and especially SB even really got more than a passing glance.

Real shame

1 Like

I can see compression causing issues and it being stuck at 11.7, but in either case, yes it needs a BR drop

1 Like

statistiks))) prove otherwise
please buy 2s38 dear customer)))

I disagree. If you are using it in your argument to adjust something, you need to disclose it. You are quite literally asking players to just blindly trust you on a decision that is impacting them. Anonymity doesn’t fly here. I can understand not disclosing cheat and exploit detection, thats fine. But not here. Leaning way too hard into the “trust me bro” aspect.

7 Likes

the real nut-kicker change for me was the AMX going to 11.0
oh yeah and the later Q5 variants going to 10.0 is really something else

4 Likes

They are not asking for blind trust because we KNOW their methods require the stats to be gathered naturally, without parties knowing the specific metrics being gathered.
It’s similar to how anti-cheat devs will never tell alleged cheaters how they were banned, cause disclosing that information makes it easier to manipulate gameplay.

@pooqich
The issue with the Q-5 variants is even in uptiers, they’re extremely survivable doing their strike runs, as very few things can climb as well as a Q-5.

So an interceptor isn’t going to get an air spawn? You’ve gotta be kidding us, right? Please tell me this is a joke.

image

2 Likes