Yeaaaah, do you realize that if one allied SPAA is respawns in battle, the Type 81 (C) will not have time to make a single shot? They can see farther and fire farther than the Type 81 (C).
And if the aircraft does not enter the 8 kilometer kill zone, it is invulnerable?
The most effective SAM is when you’re alone in battle and there’s a dumb CAS against you. Cool, it’s not hard to be effective under those conditions.
Not by that much. The R-27ER is still very competitive with it and actually has a proper seeker and G pull to go with it.
There’s no other option. That’s the entire point. Maybe read my post next time? The F-14 has been artificially held back from being good in CQC. A loadout of Aim-7E-2s, only 2 R-27Rs, and 2 Aim-9Ps isn’t nearly enough. For even 12.7.
Just say you hate France and move on. Learn to objectively balance the game instead of relying on your stats. They clearly have issues, and it’s insane how no one in gaijins side can see that.
Somehow these are worse too??? No changes to the Q-5s??? How are they 10.0 capable?
I want someone from Gaijin to explicitly state that the Q-5A and L are balanced at 10.0 by looking at objective comparisons and not gaijins efficiency metric. I dare you to do it, and to explain how a plane that can’t break Mach 1 at sea level, while not carrying any air to air missiles, with only 9 flare pops, is worthy of 0.3 below the F-8U, Mig-21smt, and how it is higher than the Mig-21S, T-2, or the harriers.
R-27ER has a dV of 1076m/s. The Fakour has 1,432m/s. That’s a 33% increase. For comparison, the ER has 12% more dV than an AIM-7M. Additionally, the Fakour is an ARH missile meaning you can fire off all 4 compared to a single R-27.
And I don’t care that there’s “no other option”. The F-14 IRIAF is a dominant BVR vehicle. If you don’t want to play BVR, don’t play the BVR vehicle. If hypothetically I hated dogfighting and only wanted to bomb, I wouldn’t complain that the F-16 is a dogfighter and not a bomber, and ask for it to go down in BR because it can’t bomb well!
It’s actually quite good, and there is a decent thrust upgrade too, but the plane gets so much heavier that I’d consider the flight performance equivalent/partially worse than the Mig-19.
The br of the Kurnass 2000 is going to be raised to 11.7. Since the F-5E family and the F-4 have already been upgraded (it seems that only the Russian 11.3 CAS aircraft remain unchanged), I don’t have too much to complain about. But at least China has a lineup at 11.3. Does Israel have any lineup at 11.7? Gaijin, you really should lower the Merkava 4 back to 11.7!
Hello, Gaijin team.
Can you please add more FFAR rocket pods to AB.205 from Italy as well? Right now, it’s armament loadout is pitiful (with only 14 rockets) for a starter helicopter and it’s painful to research the next heli with it. It doesn’t help that aiming them is also a bit difficult, so it’s hard to get a shot on a small target like a tank and it can’t take bases efficiently either since it takes too long.
XM800T unironically has to go to 6.7 or 7.0 if people want it to be balanced. Its 66mm penning APDS would be neutralized by the amount of heavies having more than 70mm armor all-around and it would be nothing more than a mosquito. It’s a vehicle that is balanced more by lowering its BR. Either that or increase it to 9.0 where tanks are fairly nimble to deal with it while they still don’t have much protection from the side to make the XM800T pointless.
The only thing that i dont understand, its most of 14.0 going to 13.0 in GRB but the F-15E still 12.7, USA needs to stop having a lot of click-bait users and this is the best way at least for now, just look at the U.S win-rate.
Still kept J-7D on 10.7
while keeping the Killing Q-5A/L to 10.0, which can possibly lead to further A-5C nerf into 11.0.
Gaijin, Why you hates strike aircraft so freakin much?
As a Joke, I can’t wait to see F-16ADF down to 12.3 because it can’t bomb with napalm while Tornado GR.1 goes 12.0 because it can bomb.
While US gets another subsidy in their P-47D-28 down to 4.7 because of playing badly and licking the ground, but both of P-47D-30 outside US remain at 5.0
Splendid work Gaijin. Splendid.
Please keep killing the game step by step.
@Smin1080p_WT Any idea how to get the F-104 ASA moved down a br or two? I cant see any reason why it should be at 12.0 when i doubt there are enough players playing it to get accurate stats for it. So would making a report be the best idea or just playing it enough to where you see it isnt functioning as well as it should be. Even 11.7 would stop it facing ARH missiles.
f104 S and tas are at 11.3 where the f4e is at with 2 more missiles and the ability to carry 4 better sarh missiles along with its cannon, so yeah the s and tas should be 11.0 but they’re not my main concern. I grinded italy to play the f104 asa specifically as it looked quite fun just to have them move everything up to 12.0 from 11.3 for “decompression” and see the f104 asa get moved to 12.0 which just negated any concept of decompression when it was one of the hardest hit with compression…
Having an unusable rwr at those brs is a death sentence as you face 7fs every game which have no smoke trail by the time they hit you. Plus the lack of missiles makes it extraordinarily hard to get kills as 4 9ls is no longer as good as they used to be. Even the premium harrier 2s at 11.3 get 4 9ls and with a FAR FAR better fm.