Responding To Dev Server Feedback Regarding Turret Baskets

Ah yes, the voice of the opposition.

How long were autoloaders allowed to function, while manual reload wasn’t possible, in case of:

  • barrel and or breach damage;
  • FPE activation;
  • loader killed, which really drops the reload south of 10sec;
  • crew swap, where loader dropped the shells switch seats and then went back;

For any manual loader to receive max speed, you need: max crew skills in reload and command and purchase Expert (1.120.000 SL) or ACE (1.430.000 RP or 2300 GE), which leo2 needs to be faster then T-80 (6.5s) loader. A thing autoloaders don’t have to do, granted would help other stats but not reload.

If you think repair is to long, make a topic about it.

While not at top tier USSR, currently at T80B, Object 292, etc, having aced all T-72 series before that i can say, they can take quite a beating and never had much issues with the autolader. Sure zooming around in a Type 90 or Type 10p is more fun, but they have nowhere near the power to push towards an objective, armor is non-existant.

4 Likes

U answered the other guy with this bruh😑

Right… So u are a dude that has a family and doesnt want o die. Even if it doesnt work they will surely take it no matter what

Not really. Those sensitive components are maybe 5% of the surface area of the turret basket.

This is also a gross simplification. The turret on the Abrams, for example, often rips pieces off the turret basket. When it does this the tank continues to function normally. The hydraulics operate at 1500-1700 psi, the basket is not strong enough to stand up to that.

A USMC veteran on the M1A1 Abrams tank: “This tank was designed for assault!” - News - War Thunder

I know what I’m talking about. Basically you are providing inaccurate and ignorant justifications. If you are doing this for balance, fine. But it has nothing to do with realism. Don’t try and hide behind that please.

7 Likes

Whats your point? thats literally what ive been saying this whole time?

EDIT: What you have said, and are also saying makes zero sense at all.
and also absolutely off topic so isntead of getting locked or muted, enough is enough

😑
U said that red army WASNT soviet army
😑

What’s better is this gem is left alone and still present.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/N56mDqoohdMa

groans audibly

1 Like

I hate this change as well and never clamored for it. Why would anyone ever learn aim if no matter where you place your shots your guaranteed to disable something? It’s making the game more like call of duty where no matter how bad your aim is who ever gets the first shot in wins

Most people’s caveats to no no damage hits fell squarely on the snail’s spaghetti code( or hidden tweaks and modifiers)which will still happen btw regardless if there is a component there or not

1 Like

It’s also INCREDIBLY fake. Just pure fantasy. It’s not how it works in the Abrams at all.

2 Likes

A broken barrel / breech didn’t allow you to continue to reload / fire. Once it was broken, it was broken, not sure where you pulled that from. FPE activation shouldn’t stop an auto loader, nor a fully crewed manual loaded tank.

I’m glad you bring up manually loaded tanks, because even with the loss of two crew the abrams is quite survivable, as dead crew eat spall.

You ever think the cons to the series work in favor of the NATO tanks or no?
Leo 2: 6.0 sec reload
T-80B: 7.1 sec maxed reload.

Your point? Leo 2 has better armor btw. And an aced crew has far more benefits than your simplified statement.

Well for having that extra pen and damage, it loses armor, reload, mgs, and it can be ammo racked even easier.

Are you crazy?

They had over 20+ before 2020, “The Russian state conglomerate Rostec stated in December 2021 that serial production had commenced, with “more than 40” Armata tanks anticipated to be delivered to Russian troops after 2023.”

If following the values in which they’ve been producing them. It is likely above or around 62~

Buddy talking like the Armata got some UFO level of Tech.

I said that the name was changed and it technically wasnt the same thing.
like how the league of nations became nato essentially.

im saying the RUSSIAN army isnt the sme as the red army

Like a mig25 situation int it realistically, we have it on paper that its a wonder weapon.

IRL isnt it likely to be around the same if only marginally better than a sep V3, 2a8 etc etc.

I mean the chinese MBTs IRL are about on par as well from what we know.

Russians are known to talk BIG about their stuff, but when it comes to irl they turn out to be a**.

2 Likes

No crew in the turret
Good reverse
Good round
Good armor
Go hull down (even if you had HE you don’t have the penetration or the amount of HE necessary to cause any damage) get free kills
Idk why that’s such a hard concept for so many. However we don’t need that added to the game. Plus if added in when there’s no equivalent chances are they’ll nerf it to hell from the get go and it’ll be another type 10 situation. They won’t fix it, they’ll deny all bug reports with official documentation, and they’ll ignore you until your some big name YouTube complaining about its reload

2 Likes

More a premium version is made that shows signs of poor sales.

Still
Angers me, makes me frustrated, I work 10x as hard for a legitimate and deserved change
Based off a quick calculation and to keep things balanced
The armor of the type 10 and TKX should be
791 for either turret cheek
650 for the UFP
Still able to penetrated by anyone with skill
Rewarding those players.
Gaijin should never have added these tanks in if they were going to just shaft them like that



for a tank that actually needs it and the guy with 500,000 subs complains once and gets what he wants.
Will probs do the same thing in the future. Maybe if no one plays Japan we can get what their actual numbers are

2 Likes