I really wish we’d stop seeing cool unique TT additions as squadron vehicles. It’s nice they can be earned for free but I don’t like spending months grinding for one vehicle either.
Without any way to speed up the grind either other than just playing the game doing something else. By the time I’ve gotten the vehicle I’ve usually stopped caring.
Yeah its a great tank, one of the best 2.
OP is about the abrams not stacking up to either of them.
Not that I play Abrams. t90m or the leo. I have the Strv but dont like the thermals.
it’s fine for VT-5, there is also a heavy armored one in Datamine, should be TT, also ZTZ-15 should be TT too. but now gaijin almost screw it up, composite armor filled with air, hull is made of paper, and now a huge turret bucket.
It doesn’t get composite armor?
it has, but filled with air, no x-ray model, 80mm in front and 10? in back, air in middle.
I mean, it’s made to be a “light weight MBT”, should have enough armor against normal threat like auto cannon and old apfsds shells. but now air composite and 15mm hull armor. seriously?
Could be still in the “work in progress” stage(?)
hard to say, they may finally add turret composite armor, but the others possibly won’t change, they’ve changed once from ZTZ-96 place hold value.
it will still be a paper tank. 33 tons but front armor can’t hold 30mm apfsds and side can’t hold .50 cal
I would like to know what the basis is for the VT5 turret basket, or how the developers know that the VT5 turret basket is this shape, there is no public information that indicates that the VT5 has a turret basket.
They know better than us bro
VT-5 side can be 50 cal?
tf
What is required is a compelling and substantiated proof. If he possesses legitimate public information confirming that the VT5 indeed features a turret basket, then I would have no objection to it.
they arent gonna give it, they never really did
You have consistently dismissed reports founded on speculation. However, this time you have made assumptions about the VT5 being equipped with a turret basket and consequently reported based on these presumptions?
It cant be any other way
CRAZY
Nah every tank must have turret basket especially with autoloaders. The only tank that didnt have turret basket is t34 or is2. Dudes literally had to walk around the tank to keep with turret lmao
I understand the necessity of maintaining balance in the game, and the developers have repeatedly emphasized that numerous adjustments, including but not limited to reload times, are made with this goal in mind. They assert that their game is based on realism; however, this objective has not been fully achieved. Given the diverse range of vehicles in the game, I believe it is important for players to be treated equitably. While refining the internal structure is not problematic, it is unfair to refine one vehicle before another as this creates an uneven playing field.
The members of the VT5 group are seated on chairs attached to the turret (VT-5(2)_哔哩哔哩_bilibili). On the second page, it is evident that only eggshell collectors are located beneath the turret, while the gunner and the captain are seated in chairs mounted on the turret.
Oh yeah… I just read that there are only seats attached to turret so that makes sense. Sry for my supidity I also thought vt5 had carousel autoloader but it has same autoloader as leclercs or type10s so yeah there shouldnt be turret basket. Well atleast not that big as it is but its probably placeholder just like they did to abrams and leo2s.
Apparently even chinease tanks get turret basket now but not russian tanks bruh
currently, its X-ray model = damage model
Ye they did the same with abrams and leo2s but they adjusted them for better (leo2 atleast but abrams and vt5 probably too)
