groans audibly
1 Like
I hate this change as well and never clamored for it. Why would anyone ever learn aim if no matter where you place your shots your guaranteed to disable something? It’s making the game more like call of duty where no matter how bad your aim is who ever gets the first shot in wins
Most people’s caveats to no no damage hits fell squarely on the snail’s spaghetti code( or hidden tweaks and modifiers)which will still happen btw regardless if there is a component there or not
1 Like
It’s also INCREDIBLY fake. Just pure fantasy. It’s not how it works in the Abrams at all.
2 Likes
A broken barrel / breech didn’t allow you to continue to reload / fire. Once it was broken, it was broken, not sure where you pulled that from. FPE activation shouldn’t stop an auto loader, nor a fully crewed manual loaded tank.
I’m glad you bring up manually loaded tanks, because even with the loss of two crew the abrams is quite survivable, as dead crew eat spall.
You ever think the cons to the series work in favor of the NATO tanks or no?
Leo 2: 6.0 sec reload
T-80B: 7.1 sec maxed reload.
Your point? Leo 2 has better armor btw. And an aced crew has far more benefits than your simplified statement.
Well for having that extra pen and damage, it loses armor, reload, mgs, and it can be ammo racked even easier.
Are you crazy?
They had over 20+ before 2020, “The Russian state conglomerate Rostec stated in December 2021 that serial production had commenced, with “more than 40” Armata tanks anticipated to be delivered to Russian troops after 2023.”
If following the values in which they’ve been producing them. It is likely above or around 62~
Buddy talking like the Armata got some UFO level of Tech.
I said that the name was changed and it technically wasnt the same thing.
like how the league of nations became nato essentially.
im saying the RUSSIAN army isnt the sme as the red army
Like a mig25 situation int it realistically, we have it on paper that its a wonder weapon.
IRL isnt it likely to be around the same if only marginally better than a sep V3, 2a8 etc etc.
I mean the chinese MBTs IRL are about on par as well from what we know.
Russians are known to talk BIG about their stuff, but when it comes to irl they turn out to be a**.
2 Likes
No crew in the turret
Good reverse
Good round
Good armor
Go hull down (even if you had HE you don’t have the penetration or the amount of HE necessary to cause any damage) get free kills
Idk why that’s such a hard concept for so many. However we don’t need that added to the game. Plus if added in when there’s no equivalent chances are they’ll nerf it to hell from the get go and it’ll be another type 10 situation. They won’t fix it, they’ll deny all bug reports with official documentation, and they’ll ignore you until your some big name YouTube complaining about its reload
2 Likes
More a premium version is made that shows signs of poor sales.
Still
Angers me, makes me frustrated, I work 10x as hard for a legitimate and deserved change
Based off a quick calculation and to keep things balanced
The armor of the type 10 and TKX should be
791 for either turret cheek
650 for the UFP
Still able to penetrated by anyone with skill
Rewarding those players.
Gaijin should never have added these tanks in if they were going to just shaft them like that
for a tank that actually needs it and the guy with 500,000 subs complains once and gets what he wants.
Will probs do the same thing in the future. Maybe if no one plays Japan we can get what their actual numbers are
2 Likes
I can understand where you are coming from it’s annoying.
Once again i think you are misstating what happened.
HSTV-L added
Guy complains about reload
Gaijin sleeps
RDF/LT is added
Guy is name dropped in stream to “be excited”
Guy says he isn’t
Gaijin sees people not interested in pack
Gaijin changes reload speed.
It’s called requirements
Requirements change
Just because it has so and so armor
And it has so and so gun
Doesn’t mean it’s ready for service. Things change and they want something a little better. Not cancelled but really it’s just that the requirements keep changing so they have to keep changing/innovating
1 Like
Same as the merkavas, arietes, cr2s and leclercs.
All have massive issues, its beyond absurd, then people like yourself are trawling through swathes of documents to try get it the vehicles even semi realistic and it gets shot down.
It it aint the big 3 man they just do not care.
Exactly my point.
As it stands we dont truly know, however it does seem to be a fairly good tank.
Merkava’s irl don’t have that much armor.
If there are documents stating otherwise that’d be an interesting read. Besides the merkava isn’t known as one of the best tanks because of its armor. It’s known as one of the best for because of the mission parameters it has to deal with.
It fits its mission just as well as the type 10.
Meaning it just works and will have almost 0 issues with how it’s built to how it’s implemented.
The ariete idk anything about I’ll need to look into it.
I asked for documentation relating to the Leclerc and all I got was crickets. So like it’s anyone’s ball park there.
I can’t think of a single time outside the foxbat where that’s the case. They don’t usually even talk about their equipment and that stands with the lack of information you get about them.
Can barely find anything on their tanks outside of news media and that’s not official.
The merkavas dont have much armour?
They are one of the heaviest and well armoured MBTs in the world.
While the weight doesn’t directly corolate to Armour, if you took 5 minutes to look through the various posts on the merkavas, theres literally hundreds of photos, and evidence to suggest that the merkava armour in warthunder is vastly under performing.
Much the same as CR2’s and even its ERA.
Put it this way, the merkava series after the mk3 are widely regarded as one of the most well defended MBTs on the planet.
Hardly, the merkava IRL is designed for the crew survivability first and foremost, again same as CR2 is, then firepower then mobility.
The golden trinity so to speak of tank design.
Isreal (not talking about whats going on right now) is surrounded by aggressors who they have over the past near 80 years fought with consistently. the merkavas composite packages are designed to take hits, get pulled off then replaced.
Unlike in a say abrams, when the composite is forged into its actual frame work and in the armour.
Merkava composites are modular. much like type 10.
Theres hundreds of documents proving the leclerc armour, fire rate and I believe FCS are incorrect.
old forum and new.
The T90 when it was introduced was touted quite highly, same as the T80’s when in reality (like any tank) theyre not as good as they seem.
EDIT: Just on the caveat of the merkava, theres a pretty old bug report, that comprehensively shows how incorrect the armour is in game, (that BTW is accepted by gaijin)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1eYOWMuJWJ3n