There are factories still slowly manufacturing these tanks, that means by both definitions of those words, they are actively producing tanks.
If you say, they haven’t went into mass production then ofc thats irefutable, they have not mass produced them.
Well considering they crewed the T14 , threw it onto the frontlines id say its at least been in partial service unlike muas which never had its turret put on it :D
MBT 70 was a cancelled project with only one or two actually made last I checked.
There was no factories actively making the tank.
MBT70 sits like MBT80 for britain, never really got as far as it could have.
The T14 is beyond prototype stage as far as we know information wise.
The red army hasnt existed since 1946 why’d you keep bringing it up xD
bro dont “son” me it sound like u trying to be a grown up
then why the fork did they send it on the frontline???
they send it to asset the effectiveness off it, and its not even frontline they just send it to test if its gonna survive which now u said that they would lose it which is funny because they dont really send it directly on the frontline, they send it in a protected area to test for firepower
Same hull design, same autoloader, same gun, same doctrine
Just more expensive
Just make more T-80BVM then cuz that shit is way less expensive
Well, at least I will know what AASM 250 (SBU 64) are when I go into France, Rafale, and equip them as a secondary. The game doesn’t say “IR Hammers” now do they?
The head of the Russian defense conglomerate Rostec, Sergey Chemezov, confirmed that the state-of-the-art Russian tank, the T-14 “Armata,” is not being deployed in the war in Ukraine, which the Kremlin has labeled a “special military operation.”
Chemezov attributed this decision to the tank’s exorbitant cost, indicating that the military is opting for the more economical T-90 tanks instead. He underscored the prohibitive expense of the Armata as a deterrent to its immediate deployment, stressing the need for funds to develop newer and more cost-effective tank models.
“In terms of its functionality, it certainly surpasses existing tanks, but it’s too expensive, so the army is unlikely to use it now. It’s easier for them to buy the same T-90s,” Chemezov said.
Major difference, Red Army is for the Soviet Union, which included the likes of Russia, but plenty of other Soviet nations such as Georgia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and more. Russia is just Russia.
I don’t blame you, Red Army sounds cooler than Russian Army.
Three bloody years on this game, and now I learn we get nicknames for these things. Unfortunately, I’m not seeing Mavericks when I hover over AGM 65Ds, but I digress. At least now I know what Hammers are.
Then stop using statements like " the red army" which hasn’t existed since 1946, the current Russian military is called the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation aka the army of the russian federation
I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say here, try reword it
Same hull design ? got a source for that?
As its a reworked larger hull with the crew moved to the front.
The autoloader is also different as the full turret is now unmanned.
last i checked its a newer 125mm gun, Believe only used on the T90M and T14.
And the doctrine for the T14 is not the same as when the USSR made say, T72, or T80 so the tank has changed, hence the height differences.
They’re systematically making.
T80BVM 3s I think it is, T72B3s, T90Ms, as well as refurbishing old tanks as well.
hence why the T14 is on a skeleton production line.
It sounds ignorant af and the damages the red army caused it is quite a poor name, it is not infact “cool” if you knew the history behind it.
Yes like i stated to you previously, the cost of it and moral effect of losing it one would be detrimental to them?
whats so hard to understand about it.
He also states that the same as the su57 it relied on western technology that of which has been incrdibly difficult for the russians to get.
This is beyond off topic and youre literally not going anywhere with your points?
