The Taiwanese M60A3TTS has the DM33, which is better than the M774, in the same BR as the American version. You could simply add the M833 to the American M60A3 without changing anything else, and absolutely nothing would happen, the same as adding the M774 to the M60A1RISE. Changing the BR would only be justified if the M60A1RISE received the M833 (which it would, by adding the M60A1RISE without ERA and with the M744), and the M60A3TTS received the M900 (which it wouldn’t do; instead, it would give it the ERA as an unlockable module, for historical reasons).
Are you aware that prototypes are real?
w… what?
was worried cause usually the tech trees are kinda wild, but this is great
2 Likes
US needs more vehicles to fill the ATGM line. M113 TOW when
That makes no sense. Just because smt has a missle that it can fire its not a pure missle launcher.
It makes absolute no sense in term of a “line” as an IFV is often similar used as a Light tank. But a M60A3 is 100% not used as a IFV, thats nonsense.
If u want to bnd the m60A3 with a light then take the sheridan, they atleast share the same gun.
And by playstyle u play the striker alot like the m60A3… usually hidden, somewhere in the second line.
while switching places of the bradley and XM800T can you also move that thing to 9.0 already?
1 Like
The two lines of light tanks would make more sense if one of them contained the ones with autocannons (XM800T, M3 Bradley, M1296 Dragoon, M3A3 Bradley, and HSTV-L) and the other contained those with high-caliber guns (Stingray, M1128, and M10 Booker).
I feel like it wouldve made more sense that the Stingray and Booker be moved to the Starhip’s line and keep the MGS there aswell, as it creates a sort of “Fire Support Vehicle” Line, and the then keeping the Bradleys where they are and adding the Dragoon for an IFV line. To me that would make more sense for consistency’s sake but… i guess?
Im more excited fir whats coming to fill the new gaps tho… 🤔