that’s not a replay. that is a kill-cam. I view replays of the matches.
how? my take was - you can pop out, launch a spike, then hide. you told me that bmp2 can do the same with the same amount of success. communication issue?
I don’t see where I am accusing you of doing that. when you see a sign that says “do not smoke”, do you also think it accuses you of smoking? i can recommend a few good teachers, if you’d like their counseling.
yeah I actually talked about you removing some formatting that showed you were clearly upset. but I guess you’re following the advice I innately gave. which is - stop trying to hide your emotions.
Bruhathkayosaurus moment. Never knew stating a fact is ad hominem, I guess we learn something new everyday on the WT forum.
how? my take was - you can pop out, launch a spike, then hide. you told me that bmp2 can do the same with the same amount of success. communication issue?
Where. At no point did you say “hide”. Secondly, “hiding” doesn’t mean the vehicle must be literally removing itself from the LoS, it can mean that it’s ereasing its presence by hiding behind bushes, or exposing only a small part of itself.
I don’t see where I am accusing you of doing that.
“Don’t act like Spikes can’t kill tanks”
“I never said Spikes can’t kill tanks”
Mental gymnastics, honestly.
yeah I actually talked about you removing some formatting that showed you were clearly upset.
I didn’t remove anything, but m’kay, whatever makes you feel better.
yeah you went ad hominem even earlier, when you pointed out my lack of experience with spikes. look up what ad hominem means. it can be facts!
yeah I have said “vulnerability” is needed to guide bmp2 missiles. and that is true. you have to expose your turret (which blows up from anything 30mm and above). spikes do not need require this. exposing a small part is still being vulnerable, because of bmp’s fragility.
yeah you just don’t understand english, please stop coping.
Then… it’s a fact and thus not an ad hominem? Call it criticism of your argument borne out of your lack of experience, but not an hominem since it wasn’t an argument against you, should be easier to understand.
yeah I have said “vulnerability” is needed to guide bmp2 missiles. and that is true. you have to expose your turret (which blows up from anything 30mm and above). spikes do not need require this. exposing a small part is still being vulnerable, because of bmp’s fragility.
Right, so we’ve cleared up that you did not say “hide” anywhere, so by arguing superficially for a scenario where the vehicle is literally invisble, rather than one where it’s just “hiding”, i.e the one I introduced, you committed to a strawman.
;)
yeah you just don’t understand english, please stop coping.
Anybody who has gone through primary school can see what you were impliying at back there with your statement, gaslighting ain’t gonna help you here lad.
Pretty sure they buffed their pen, and they usually target the drivers hatch in the T series tanks. They are better than before at least. The italian vehicle with 12 of them is pretty good
Going from “utterly useless” to “mostly utterly useless” ain’t that much better if you ask me. Granted, Freccia benefits the most from it, but that’s only because it has so many of them so it doesn’t have to “ration” them like everything else, afaik Namer has only four, Puma also has four, and Lynx has recently been nerfed to just two, iirc?
additionaly many ifv fnf launchers suffer under stiff launcher syndrom where u cant adjust the launch angle, resulting in a minimum engagement distance and general skewed targeting
that’s not how it works. you brought up my quality as one of the reasons why my take is bad. ad hominem.
let’s look at what i’ve said in the first place:
so now youre grasping at straws, because a quote does not have to be an exact copy paste. by saying “go behind a building” i meant “hide”. so no, we have not agreed upon the statement that I never meant “hide” anywhere.
grim. your comprehension of text is so weird: you see accusations against you everywhere… I’m sure more reddit spacing will help though
Where did I bring up “your quality”? Do show me a screenshot.
so now youre grasping at straws
You wanna mention how you’ve taken these comments out of order, and failed to fetch one of mine, that you strawmanned? Or nah?
grim.
See, this is why I like this place, you can be accused of something, and when you call people out on things, they will try to gaslight you that they never said anything along the lines of what they actually did.
you called me out on something only you “saw”. I said “Don’t act like spikes can’t kill tanks” because that is a common theme people mention in every discussion about spikes that I have seen. but you take it personally; you think I accuse you of pushing a take that spikes can’t kill tanks. do not blame others for your mental disposition.
