Remove Abrams from china

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

12 Likes

Which CHINA “PRC” or ?

As the country of origin of the JAS39, Sweden also didn’t get the AH64E, and their air force is quite weak, so shouldn’t they need strengthening even more than Japan?

1 Like

Agreed.

The chinese players cried that the VT4 timing was bad because of their Victory Day, now we are passed that day, so there’s no reason for Gaijin to hold this tank back.

10 Likes

If Gaijin can find something suitable for a top tier heli/jet for sweden that fills gaps they’ll probably add it, they’ve already been trying with the Norwegian F-16AM and Helis Sweden only trialled.

i think he means republic of china, which is the country of taiwan.

not the peoples republic of china which is the CCP china

the taiwan abrams should be where taiwan is placed. however due to chinas players being how they are, we need a balancing factor with the VT4 going to japan for the subtree

Yes, China has gotten what they wanted, not that they received a Christmas gift, while we came back empty-handed.

Different turret.
SEP3 hull that’s different.
No urban survival kit options.
No DU armor.
No DU rounds.

The M1A2T is no where close to copy-paste.

6 Likes

I dont see that much complaint around like germany getting a swiss F/A-18, and thats basically the same thing.

I get wanting parity for the treatment of nations. But i dont really think that saying no su-30 would be apt for such.

5 Likes

As I’m part Taiwanese I can’t say I’d be very much offended if he’d meant PRC. If it’s ROC than I’ll chillax

Yeah, I understand what you’re thinking. Thank you.

my best mate lives in Hong kong and is half cantonese himself and gets deeply offended by being labelled as the same as mainland chinese. I understand your feelings fully, very sensitive topic

5 Likes

One of many reasons why I stopped supporting Gaijin financially. They DO NOT care about the community and people for some reason keep thinking otherwise by the smallest changes is them caring. The Q&A video was a great example that they don’t care about what we have to say because the player base will keep playing regardless of bad changes. (People still played during the review SL economy review bomb).

1 Like

Nah, leave Abrams. I’d rather play Abrams in Chinese tree than have to bother with playing USA.

From my experiences woth IRIS T, I have no issue. The current top chinese spaa is also very deadly against munitions

Basic M1A2T issule similar like Custom Flag issule ,basic weapons from two opposing countries were placed together.

No one complained because the rest of the playerbase doesnt throw a fit when an export vehicle is added

5 Likes

I am outright the author of a entire thread, when they came out, speaking directly to the fact that the premium swiss F/A-18 was flat out better than the US one in every single way.

I think the difference is the Chinese Player base do not want the Taiwan(ROC) Flag as and option to use instead of the Chinese flag so why should they get vehicles from Taiwan(ROC) if they’re so ungrateful

9 Likes

Time to do the funny like we did for the economic “update” they tried

4 Likes