I once suggested putting Chinese players into their own dedicated server and giving all Chinese vehicles insanely buffed stats so they could stomp NATO nonstop My comment got deleted right away. ：D
4 Likes
The only ideologically consistent argument against the M1A2T’s addition posted to my knowledge.
Congrats, I hate it. XD
I love that you’re consistent though.
Gaijin doesn’t understand that this is best for everyone. Separate the two noisy groups.
Just do it.
3 Likes
Talking about moderation is straight up not allowed and your comments will be removed and time out given if done multiple times.
3.8. It is not allowed to discuss threads closed by the Administration or Website Managers or any Users’ posts deleted by them, challenge or discuss corresponding actions of Administration, Moderators (and/or Global Moderators), Community Managers, Coordinators, and Game Masters in any form. Depending on the circumstances and severity, the following sanctions may be imposed on the User’s Gaijin Account:
I’ve been given this message before lol
The Republic of China disagrees with you about them not being China.
I don’t get why there are hundreds to thousands of posts on the forum trying to deny Republic of China’s identity.
PRC is also not a tech tree in War Thunder, and also isn’t ROC.
Republic of china ≠ People’s republic of china
I would mind but why is its operators flag wrong then? the reason why i dont want the M1A2T not in the chinese TT is Japan cannot get the VT-4!
5 Likes
Also saw some ppl voice this wish on dc. the reasoning is bot account and those political point etc…
1 Like
I was agreeing, just in a strange ass way(consistent RDXRooster63 behavior)
1 Like
M1A2T being denied is the same as denying Japan’s Type 10.
All these vehicles deserve to be in War Thunder.
Thai VT-4, China’s M1A2T, Japan’s Type 10, USSR’s T-80U, etc.
3 Likes
Well before this thread gets locked for being political…
No Abrams for china, not after VT4 drama and return the Taiwanese flag i would like to replace the chinese flag with something more suitable to the majority of content within that tree.
K fanks
3 Likes
Look if Gaijin added the VT-4 this update nothing would have happend. This only reason this happens because the double standards Gaijin is pulling now.
5 Likes
It took me over a month to finally make the following statement non-political.
IF Gaijin’s source is the United Nations list of flags, I fear we might not ever get it.
IF Gaijin is accepting of national sources instead of the United Nation’s list of flags, we might get it.
However, it’s difficult to know what they’re using as their source without them telling us.
I personally want the flag as an option, I’m probably going to continue using Bangladesh’s flag, but the option should exist.
@BadassOscar94
Double standards would be not adding the M1A2T when I can use all other tanks in the game.
I should be able to get M1A2T the same way I have ZTZ-99, and Leopard 2A6.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Heck yeah money needs rolling. But jokes aside what is unreasonable then? So we can discus our differences
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Yes add china server for china vip player
3 Likes
What’s unreasonable, for example, is Japan having successfully acquired that Su-30MKM against all odds.