Remove Abrams from china

“fairness” bruh its the most modern tank for America and its not even in their own tree.
Further more wears anything “modern” on the US abrams, its just now getting the ROSY system but without that its just an early 2008 garbage ERA package. They shouldve just added the APS to begin with 2 years ago.

Stop diverting the issue

IT’S NOT THE TANK PERFORMANCE IT’S BECAUSE IT’S USED BY ROYAL THAI ARMY

3 Likes

exactly my point, theyve made it clear multiple times that whether user nation bought them or has a stock of those weapons is irrelevant. that rule is apparently applied on SU30MKM getting KH38’s but not on f18 mlu 2

‘‘The presence or absence of supplies is irrelevant. Only the technical feasibility of using the weapons matters.’’

see the bug report (Community Bug Reporting System)

why?if you want to remove the m1a2t , you also have to remove the m60a3tts chn , L2A7HU , L2A4/5/6NL and so so.

Gaijin has always used ammunition as a soft balancing tool, they’ve never stated that all vehicles must use historically accurate ammo loadouts.

Does DU armor give any benefit in-game? As far as I’m aware, the M1A2T has the same exact level of protection as the M1A2 (along with the Seps).

I wouldn’t put it past gaijin to give the same exact round and armor the SepV3 has to the M1A2T because “muh compatibility”

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

2 Likes

You’re the one being ridiculous. Tell me, then—if Taiwan is as you claim, why does it use the ROC flag instead of the PRC flag? Stop barking and look at reality.
And besides, whether Taiwan is a country or not isn’t even the main topic of this discussion.

Well so far no, the 1A2T doesnt have it.

Also yes DU armor would help alot


. - SEPV3 armor changes (mostly internal) but some scene on the out side

Sorry for bad quality did this on my phone

by all respect, this is probably a good example why having seperate servers might be advantageous sometimes. It would more or less remove the points where the wt community is split. Gaijin wont do it since it would probably make business less profitable, so they try to appeal to all at the same time (you see how good this works rn).

1 Like

Wrong picture.

That’s not a SEP v3, that’s just a tech demonstrator.

If we are apolitical then Chinese vehicle should go into the Chinese TT.

2 Likes

It’s already past September, so why hasn’t it been added to Japan? Explain that.

maybe explain this to the guys who do not like the vt4 being added to thailand…

3 Likes

image



image

Production sep v3 moving on useless point to be made…

Then I guess for you, Ukrainians are just Russians.
Also why does China feel the need to invade itself? hmmm

2 Likes

No ?
Ukraine is a country that based many of their own vehicles on USSR designs, so the link is pretty much there. If we’re being apolitical, UA vehicles could easily go into the USSR tech tree.

2 Likes

“Ukraine is a country that based many of their own vehicles on USSR designs”
Yap M1A2T to US tech tree I agree

1 Like

Yes, most vehicles in the Republic of China (Taiwan) are based on automobiles developed in the United States.

2 Likes

If we don’t care about politics, then the ROC flag should represent China (TT), because that’s the original China.

3 Likes