Except you have to give up at least 1 A2A missile in order to equip that so the F16C Is still better
Again, this is about the abrams earlier we had 3 different topics at ounce.
Havn’t seen a poll yet surprisingly (Unless i missed it) But anyhow heres one
- Yes, China should have the abrams.
- No, China shouldn’t have the abrams. It shouldn’t be added at all.
- Sense its a Taiwan vehicle thats more inline with usa relations, It should be put in the usa.
- It should go to the usa if theres another counterpart to put into china, else keep it in china.
- other
0
voters
Give it to China once VT-4 is added to Japan. Not before that
6 Likes
Forgot to put give china Abram’s and Japan vt4
This is what makes me believe it would be better as a premium or event vehicle for the US. Much like the Iranian F-14. That, or Taiwan needs to be their own tree in War Thunder.
3 Likes
Here me out, Squadron vehicle…
In the US, then sure. The point being it should not be in a nation you cant even select the correct flag for.
1 Like
Yea sorry in US definitely should of clarified.
What bothers me is the lack of CM engagement in here. As with most things on this forum, this is probably another straight-to-the-shredder box topic. Theres been no “We see this is an issue of concern with players and here’s what we are doing about it” or “We are making sure this is getting up the necessary channels for a discussion or response.” They most likely do not care.
1 Like
Maybe he will help 🙏
Doubt it. He doesn’t like me and we have debated this before. He will just point to the F-16, Mirage, and Apache and be like “theres no issue with these being there so what makes this any different”, subsequently ignoring the numerous comments and responses and feed back that there is indeed an issue here and that hey, these should probably be seperate trees. But feedback doesnt matter because it just doesnt matter. Everything should be revisit-able when there is room for it and this is case for that now. Burying your head in the sand and pretending there isnt tension in this area of the world and certain vehicle additions can seem politically driven seems like…well…cowardice feels too harsh.
Hope, maybe just maybe it we all vote…
1 Like
Anything is possible. I would just advise not holding your breath.
i am really happy that they added the Abrams to the ROC. after all it entered atleast actuall service with their army and their soldiers and i am all in for actually used vehicles, i dont care where it was produced.
the VT-4 is afaik a tank created for export so i dont really have a desire to see it at all in game. but i know that gaijin is ignoring stuff like that mixes up vehicles used by the army and vehicles that were produced by companies located in the countries into the same tree, so it will probably come at some point like many other vehicles before
If you want to vote here is the poll, feel free to say why you think what you think but please vote to make this topic productive.
Here the poll is
that poll will not matter. At this point they don’t care at all. The only thing that will happen is that they would show different Taiwanese vehicle just like one of the user posted above. We can only hope now. They even won’t make things accurate
Taiwan shouldn’t have been added in the first place because it’s just a scapegoat to add copy paste vehicles.
Should or shouldn’t im confused?