First of the AIM9X is not needed
Secondly the F22 should not be added yet
1 Like
Laughable addition
3 Likes
9X blk 1 could be perfectly added for wingtips on the F/A-18E/F, same rocket motor, fuze and warhead of AIM-9M and less drag to AAM-3 levels if not lower, plus TVC for close range maneuverability.
Could go to the AH-1Z too, which has been missing its AIM-9Xs for a good while now.
1 Like
virtually impossible to evade seeker, 70g, thrust vector, can be fired without lock, shall I continue?
1 Like
Do your research on the Block I.
Only valid from Block II onwards (which is exactly the ones that uses SPAA systems in-game), do your homework.
Incorrect, they were all born with these abilities; Block 3 simply has these characteristics further refined. and the evolution was so rapid that the AIM-9X Block 1 was hardly produced at all, and what was actually produced in large quantities was the AIM-9X Block 2.
The R-27ET was hardly produced at all, but its quite possible to equip at least two. Your point being?
It has technical feasibility and the Block I in particular is not a checkmate missile.
And it’s not like Gaijin is willing to properly model the AIM-120 series either, so a compromise must be made if they are giving up to deliver a competitive airframe to US top tier.
The point is that the missile is too good to be included in the game at present. Quite simply, the R-27ET is a child compared to the AIM-9X Block 2 or even the Block 1.
He thinks that the missile in IRL is like the one in the game’s anti-aircraft weapons.
Block II is kinematically and fundamentally different than Block I.
But anyway, I’m thinking of solutions on how Gaijin is neglecting the US tech tree, but if you’re okay with it while gatekeeping yourself, that’s genuinely on your end.
Enjoy getting the AIM-9X when they get R-74Ms/IR MICAs/ASRAAMs outclassing you even further lol
1 Like
r-74 is a r-73 , and r-74 never exist , only r-74 m
Mica, irst, and aSRAAM they are identical to the AIM-9X, I don’t understand the crying.
lol you’re trolling
1 Like
My point quite literally proven. So even though top tier US Air is stuggling to be competitive, you simply cant give them anything because “too op”. So what? Do we just start nerfing everyone else?
6 Likes
I don’t think America is weak, nor that it lacks competitiveness, but even if it did, it wouldn’t do something that would simply make America too strong.
Everyone gets limited to six missiles. Everyone’s top speed is nerfed to the same speed as the slow F/A-18. AOA and handling performance is all nerf to the same state. All missiles are reduced to the Aim-9M specs, Aim-7M, and Aim-120C. No 40g pull, no Mach 5, its all the same.
Because allowing the US to have the particular air doctrine it decides to go into is just too OP. While the US went with stealth over high speed and maneuverablity, we wouldn’t want to force anyone else to have to adapt and overcome. Just like the US suffer at top tier air. That is an incredible stance to hold.
1 Like
Block 2 jsut adds lofting and optimized trajectories and datalink.
It’s the exact as 9x otherwise
2 Likes
I thought the block 1 used the same motor as the 9M, no?