RAAF F/A-18F: Twin-Seat Superbug!

[KENO]

the only arguments iv seen that make any sense are just wanting a cosmetically different jet but there are no gameplay differences between twin and single seater aircraft in warthunder nor are there any plans of adding any by the devs. so it would be largely pointless.

[Bongo_Chongo]

yeah agreed

[Caernarvon02]

@StormRyder13

Lol, to be fair, I’m like the one to use that Spitfire. Tho we were just playing together. And it’s a hidden premium, so unlike the CF-188, if you don’t have it, you wouldn’t know about it.

Caernarvon02:

I got it when it still incorrectly had a union flag and not a red ensign so im still relearning it.

@StormRyder13

Indeed, Canadair, AVRO Canada, and a list of like 30 other companies that built aircraft in Canada. would be nice to get their aircraft flying the Canadian flag like many of them should.

@Caernarvon02

Vehicles built by X nation should appear in the tree of said nation, even if they didnt operate it to represent industry.

this is one reason for my support of the UK tree becoming the CoN tree, represent the commonwealths industry and military history

[Bongo_Chongo]

@NGAD_THIEF-psn

It’s not about having an advantage over our already in game vehicles, it’s about having a little more diversity in what you get to use. It’s frankly tiresome seeing twin seat planes get withheld from us, as the entire playerbase for no reason, other than contradictory statements one after another, like how the UK needed the 18F to cap their naval line, but the US doesnt get it because they dont “need it”. It’s just about having the choice of another vehicle, not about it’s advantages or disadvantages, needing it or not needing it.

^^^^^

[KENO]

its not real diversity in what you get to use since it plays the EXACT SAME as the jets we already have it would make more sense to ask for jets that we dont have in the teck tree like the A6

[Bongo_Chongo]

@Bongo_Chongo

now I have to grind Japan for the F/A-18D and now the UK for the F/A-18F. thanks gaijin

^^^^
and i’m not going to spend money and time on something that is US made in another tech tree.

[Caernarvon02]

theres a reason folders exist. so that they can be skipped if the player doesnt care for the similar vehicle.

The addition of a variant of a vehicle thats already got variants in game also doesnt dismiss the entry of new platforms. Its just covering more bases within the specific lore and fanbase of a specific family.

Id love to see the T.12a harrier in game, its basically just the T10 but with HMD so its basically already in game. not missing much by it not being here but it would also be wonderful to see it. If it was to come that doesnt mean that the Supermarine spiteful wont ever come now does it?

[KENO]

you dont have to we already have a better version

[Caernarvon02]

that isnt the point.

[Bongo_Chongo]

does not matter if its better or not, like i said i suggest you to scroll up and read. we already made points about this topic.

[KENO]

so is it a purely for cosmetic reasons thing?

[Caernarvon02]

mostly yes. But bear in mind theres also personal connections to specific variants of vehicles too.

[KENO]

fair enough

[Blue_Hydra]

the 2 seater f18 is cool and all but
YOU KNOW WHAT I THINK?, I NEED MY PARTNERSHIP FROM GAIJIN.!!!

[SchizoGaming]

@codehitman22-psn

your denying yourself kills in the future

No?
We’d still be fighting the same amount of players lol and there would be like 4 of them anyways

[racimazzedine]

Dont care still not gonna get your super glazing not different f18F or D

[kizvy]

Cook bro gotta love copy paste slop that’s literally already in the tt

[Bongo_Chongo]

yap yap yap, you just ignore everything we say and just rage bait

[racimazzedine]

says the one who ignore the dev

[MatrixRupture]

Are you by chance a flanker glazer