By the same token, the E and F hornets are different planes. So, really, you’re losing your hold here.
1 Like
F is worse is flight perf.
there no losing or wining, simply cope about wanting something like a rotten gate kids who want everything for himself from you guys
I dont even want it, I’m just saying that the way people defend the belief that they shouldnt add it to the US tech tree is entirely asinine, and after all, like smin said:
Thats really all I’ve got to say to you, you’re a lost cause.
3 Likes
if i am a lost cause. where is all the double seat fighter jets ?
i got nothing against usa. simply asking and creat the problem again and again by the same people who seems to not understand that yes double seated remain a future addition but for now there are 0 and i mean 0 to the ground advantage they will have compare to the already existing in game single seat variant.
useless people who smin has giver their respond over and over again but still plays the victim.
It’s not about having an advantage over our already in game vehicles, it’s about having a little more diversity in what you get to use. It’s frankly tiresome seeing twin seat planes get withheld from us, as the entire playerbase for no reason, other than contradictory statements one after another, like how the UK needed the 18F to cap their naval line, but the US doesnt get it because they dont “need it”. It’s just about having the choice of another vehicle, not about it’s advantages or disadvantages, needing it or not needing it.
2 Likes
well truth hurt but they will not do it.
other have to get the game first. game progress and is not showing signs of slowing. in 2 year and the 4th gen are almost done and 5th get coming.
It’s sad how complicated people make it out to be when there’s a simple and completely moronic issue with no real reason to not be resolved.
2 Likes
does this not contradict itself? how would “copy paste slop” delay other projects?
2 Likes
Is USA getting F-18 with AGM-123 skipper? Or GBU-53/b or AGM-142s on anything any time soon?
It seems to me that gaijin is stalling adding CAS to every nation BUT USSR every now and then.
Sometimes they forget about France, all the time they forget about Japan, Italy, Britain, Israel, USA, Germany, Sweden.
Sure, now some nations have euros, some nations have other spice slingers, France has Rafale and Japan has a non existing 38MTE.
But what about USA? I don’t play america that high, I don’t give a flying HUG about their CAS, I just want soviets to feel the same thing NATO mains feel at least once in a while.
its not like you can take it and slap it in the us tree out of nowhere.
you need lines of codes and many thing with more storage to download and many more.
I agree with adding the new F-18, yet there’s no contradiction.
Gaijin will say “x nation already has x vehicle, they’re fat, no need to work more for balance or variety”. That’s how it always goes.
Classic Soviet main, no power, out of nutrition.
if i was soviet main, why am i grinding china and the uk and already have germany top tier ?
typical italy main.
always victim complex
so it’s only copy paste slop when it supports your argument? Where was this argument about lines of code and storage before?
5 Likes
copy paste slop because
1- they dont need it
2- will bring nothing new that the E dont have.
L ragebait, ig.
1 Like
by that logic the USN should retire all F18Fs and the USAF should put the F-15C back into production
4 Likes
Thank you
1 Like
This ^
1 Like
no one said about irl stuff, your drifting the whole duscussion…
simply that demending the f18f now will be refused not matter how you try because you cant simple add stull cuz they look cool while other country ( usa itself ) are missing stuff or dont even have top tier.