Thats how ive felt with every message youve sent man 💔
1 Like
sorry about that.
i will be more clear next time
There isnt a properly implemented subtree in the game
south africa is by far the best with some mediocre scout cars and a few good tanks. only one plane tho lol.
maybe one day subtrees will have some actual respect.
2 Likes
the AESA radar typhoons in the UK and Italy are representative of what their fleets are to be upgraded to in the future. Just as the german ones are, they just decided on a earlier mark of the AESA as they jumped the gun a bit.
as for PIRATE, unsure if the luftwaffe will adopt it. However the part is quite literally “plug and play” into the aircrafts computer systems. The initial decision to omit it was moronic, so its a no-brainer of an upgrade to the fleet.
2 Likes
Nice try but I asked for 5, you gave me 3. But let’s work with that!
What would the Rafale add to the Japanese tech tree when it already has TWO air sub trees and very decent critters both for A/A and A/G such as the 18D and Su-30, MAYBE even the Gripen…? Up to you.
What would R-73s add to the Russian tech tree when the Su-27 is right there, when the Su-34 is right there. Even so, you’re talking about the specific weaponry a plane carries, not a variant of it lol.
And sorry but Germany literally doesn’t operate that EFT. It’s like saying “Japan should the the F-15E” when Japan has F-15s just not the E variant lmao.
1 Like
lets me start again
- mig29 r73 stiation
- usa better abram on china tree
- china missing bmp series despite owing them ( own designe )
- usa wanting the better f16 that israel got
- germany missing GDR ( does it count ? still stuff that russia got despite german literly using them )
- germany asking for the kf41 when its a german made ifv
Ok dude, once again. It’s NOT that we don’t understand what he said or that we think it’s coming. We’re just pointing out inconsistecies throughout the game and our desire to have the twin seat variants added, how many times do we have to repeat ourselves.
It’s ok it might never get added, but we have the pass in this forum to discuss why and/or how it should be added, our desire for it in the US tree so on and so on, if you disagree with that… I’m sorry man, close this forum and leave us be lmfaoo, we won’t stop saying we wished the US got the twin seat hornets.
1 Like
thanks
the abrams in the chinese tree is functionally identical so not really.
less wieght mean faster reaction no ?
missing F/A-18F/D to the US tree btw
repeat.
idek what this is trying to say
sure, but at the same time this is literally the first time i have heard of this request.
valid i guess but the GDR was a part of tv soviet union. We literally have an ENTIRE TREE dedicated to these vehicles, opposed to a single F/A-18F.
again, valid
1 Like
Our right to be screwed over by gaijin shall not be infringed but we sure as hell can complain about it
1 Like
that extra weight is from TUSK, which is best not to use. the SEP and T are the same weight without that modification.
2 Likes
50% of gdr army is missing.
Elaborate please
whoops, missed this. In terms of A2A, the F-16C-50 absolutely slams any other F-16.
For A2G, the Israeli ones are equipped with the SPICE bombs, something that the US does not operate.
the SepV2 can also be equipped with an LWS
Yeah won’t go over points because samuri is giving the same answers I’d give and I want to say the US is prob getting more advanced F-16 blocks in the near future so there’s that
1 Like