Never said i knew more than him?
1 Like
idk you seem quite against it lol
2 Likes
my guy you got ratioed by 5 ppl give up bro you are NOT winning this argument.
Well if you aren’t playing it then why should you be the one to protest it coming to a tree YOU don’t play and if you do play America WHY ARE YOU COMPLAINING anymore aircraft to make the tree more diverse I swear the more you type the more I wonder if your special or not
1 Like
lmao i really dont care if you guys cant accept reality.
as i said i pointed out what dev said now good luck trying to get in the game.
i play uk tree…
only his info matter. dont care about him.
Ah no wonder your son negative, I would be too if all my tanks only used solid shot
1 Like
+looks better
which cancels out the chonk
2 Likes
- japan still waiting for rafale
- russian still waiting for a mig29 r73 for years now despite mig29g having them
- germany wanting the better eft radar
and just top of my head
Even his info isn’t a basis for solid predictions or ideas of what’s going on. Things change all the time, and what we get told is so vague that it doesn’t matter anyways. He said not as a researchable vehicle in reference to adding the F for the US, and then just said there’s no need for the F, so which is it? All im saying is its contradictory and not a good basis for forming opinions. Just look at whats already in game and how theyve done things in the past.
1 Like
Japan? Rafale? They straight up dont need it right now. And the german typhoon radar is accurate to what it has in real life, is it not?
1 Like
exactly, people want to rush it to get and says that easy since its already in game while smin even confirm it that its not needed but remain a future possibilty.
Oh yeah, giving japan a rafale is the same as a country getting their own vehicle thats in another tech tree. Makes sense to me. Yk.
1 Like
they asked for it since i think italy didnt even had the radar and still got it who led to german player to ask for the slight better radar.
also irst i think its not in service with german eft
the AESA on the german typhoon is accurate yes.
and the difference is so minimal the only people that complain either dont know what they are talking about or are speaking in bad faith
3 Likes
Ok my guy let me try to make some kindergarten analogy for you here:
- Big papa Smin said “the sky is blue”
- We are saying well it can also be orange at sunsets!
- You are whining around, fighting and fuming saying “NO BIG PAPA SAID IT’S BLUE IT’S BLUE IT’S BLUE Y’ALL DON’T KNOW ANYTHING Y’ALL ARE STUPID BIG PAPA IS RIGHT”
- We literally only pointed something out
How that correlates?
- Smin says something about the 18F going to the US tree
- We discuss what he said, pointing out inconsistencies or our overall desires, we discuss the topic, exactly the purpose of this forum
- You are MAD, fuming and saying “YOU’RE WRONG SMIN IS RIGHT Y’ALL DON’T KNOW MORE THAN HIM GOOD LUCK CHANGING HIS MIND”
- When he’s not the one directly responsible for what gets added or not. When we are expressing our desire to see the original creator of the 18F actually having it.
1 Like
I guess Royal Australian Air Force F/A-18F close to Block III standard (post upgraded)
Thats what i thought, appreciate the clarification.
2 Likes
the difference is only a few degrees of scan less, which when the scan angles are so extreme its a drop in the ocean. Really not a big deal
2 Likes