The only explanation for having as solid a position against the F18F being added as you do, is either that your daddy smin said no, or you have a personal grudge against it.
English isn’t my first language too but ight.
WHO is acting like a victim brotha??? And please list me 5, I MEAN FIVE, “some things that others have and they also want” outside the US tree. You brought this up so please elaborate on it.
Also I’m not defending the US tree like my life depends on it,
- Sweden almost got SCREWED over with the Gripen A and C situation, they got screwed over when you realize Italy and UK got their Fox 3s with a mod research while Sweden needed an entire new 400k RP plane AND spading it (what, 700K RP total?) to get theirs
- Italy was the uncontested worst tech tree for like 5 or 6 years straight
- Germany had a bunch of unique vehicles removed from their tech tree when other equivalent prototype/project vehicles from other tech trees remained for years (Take R2Y2s for example) or still remain
- Taiwan’s flag was removed for “being a military flag” while the German WW2 flag which is literally called “Imperial War Flag” is still in the game
- Well this is about the US but they got the worst F-16 variant on launch
Every tech tree suffered from a problem but what people are discussing here is just a will to have the unique twin seat variants of an aircraft literally created by the US which is being denied to the US as OPTIONAL research, it ain’t THAT serious but you are adamantly against it for some reason
2 Likes
Yeah sorry, i thought we were in a forum to discuss ways to possibly improve the game, and we could give ideas that would allow for them to ideally implement changes that some people want whilst not negatively impacting others.
1 Like
sure sure smin know more than you will even know
Never said i knew more than him?
1 Like
idk you seem quite against it lol
2 Likes
my guy you got ratioed by 5 ppl give up bro you are NOT winning this argument.
Well if you aren’t playing it then why should you be the one to protest it coming to a tree YOU don’t play and if you do play America WHY ARE YOU COMPLAINING anymore aircraft to make the tree more diverse I swear the more you type the more I wonder if your special or not
1 Like
lmao i really dont care if you guys cant accept reality.
as i said i pointed out what dev said now good luck trying to get in the game.
i play uk tree…
only his info matter. dont care about him.
Ah no wonder your son negative, I would be too if all my tanks only used solid shot
1 Like
+looks better
which cancels out the chonk
2 Likes
- japan still waiting for rafale
- russian still waiting for a mig29 r73 for years now despite mig29g having them
- germany wanting the better eft radar
and just top of my head
Even his info isn’t a basis for solid predictions or ideas of what’s going on. Things change all the time, and what we get told is so vague that it doesn’t matter anyways. He said not as a researchable vehicle in reference to adding the F for the US, and then just said there’s no need for the F, so which is it? All im saying is its contradictory and not a good basis for forming opinions. Just look at whats already in game and how theyve done things in the past.
1 Like
Japan? Rafale? They straight up dont need it right now. And the german typhoon radar is accurate to what it has in real life, is it not?
1 Like
exactly, people want to rush it to get and says that easy since its already in game while smin even confirm it that its not needed but remain a future possibilty.
Oh yeah, giving japan a rafale is the same as a country getting their own vehicle thats in another tech tree. Makes sense to me. Yk.
1 Like
they asked for it since i think italy didnt even had the radar and still got it who led to german player to ask for the slight better radar.
also irst i think its not in service with german eft
the AESA on the german typhoon is accurate yes.
and the difference is so minimal the only people that complain either dont know what they are talking about or are speaking in bad faith
3 Likes