RAAF F/A-18F: Twin-Seat Superbug!

Mind you, these are vehicles you actually HAVE to grind for, typically requiring about 2-3hrs a day to get. If you didn’t grind them, then the only option is to pay real life money on the Gaijin Market. Contrarily, a foldered 18F will:

  1. ALWAYS be available.

  2. Be available with a considerable RP discount.

I am honestly at a loss why some of you are so adamant about this jet not going to its CREATORS tree.

2 Likes

“Yes I don’t want an aircraft to go to the tech tree of the country it CAME FROM”

2 Likes

you still not gonna get it… no matter how hard you try.

Why are you against it so badly bud did the F18F personally shoot you down irl or sum ?

1 Like

not against it.
its the sad truth that you wont accept.

The only explanation for having as solid a position against the F18F being added as you do, is either that your daddy smin said no, or you have a personal grudge against it.

English isn’t my first language too but ight.

WHO is acting like a victim brotha??? And please list me 5, I MEAN FIVE, “some things that others have and they also want” outside the US tree. You brought this up so please elaborate on it.

Also I’m not defending the US tree like my life depends on it,

  • Sweden almost got SCREWED over with the Gripen A and C situation, they got screwed over when you realize Italy and UK got their Fox 3s with a mod research while Sweden needed an entire new 400k RP plane AND spading it (what, 700K RP total?) to get theirs
  • Italy was the uncontested worst tech tree for like 5 or 6 years straight
  • Germany had a bunch of unique vehicles removed from their tech tree when other equivalent prototype/project vehicles from other tech trees remained for years (Take R2Y2s for example) or still remain
  • Taiwan’s flag was removed for “being a military flag” while the German WW2 flag which is literally called “Imperial War Flag” is still in the game
  • Well this is about the US but they got the worst F-16 variant on launch

Every tech tree suffered from a problem but what people are discussing here is just a will to have the unique twin seat variants of an aircraft literally created by the US which is being denied to the US as OPTIONAL research, it ain’t THAT serious but you are adamantly against it for some reason

2 Likes

Yeah sorry, i thought we were in a forum to discuss ways to possibly improve the game, and we could give ideas that would allow for them to ideally implement changes that some people want whilst not negatively impacting others.

1 Like

sure sure smin know more than you will even know

Never said i knew more than him?

1 Like

idk you seem quite against it lol

2 Likes

my guy you got ratioed by 5 ppl give up bro you are NOT winning this argument.

Well if you aren’t playing it then why should you be the one to protest it coming to a tree YOU don’t play and if you do play America WHY ARE YOU COMPLAINING anymore aircraft to make the tree more diverse I swear the more you type the more I wonder if your special or not

1 Like

lmao i really dont care if you guys cant accept reality.

as i said i pointed out what dev said now good luck trying to get in the game.

smin don’t know u dawg LMAO

1 Like

i play uk tree…

only his info matter. dont care about him.

Ah no wonder your son negative, I would be too if all my tanks only used solid shot

1 Like

+looks better

which cancels out the chonk

2 Likes
  • japan still waiting for rafale
  • russian still waiting for a mig29 r73 for years now despite mig29g having them
  • germany wanting the better eft radar

and just top of my head

Even his info isn’t a basis for solid predictions or ideas of what’s going on. Things change all the time, and what we get told is so vague that it doesn’t matter anyways. He said not as a researchable vehicle in reference to adding the F for the US, and then just said there’s no need for the F, so which is it? All im saying is its contradictory and not a good basis for forming opinions. Just look at whats already in game and how theyve done things in the past.

1 Like